WATCHING FIREFLYComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Game, TV, and Screenwriting Blog

Baby Name Voyager graphs baby name frequency by decade.

Social Security Administration: Most popular names by year.

Name Trends: Uniquely popular names by year.

Reverse Dictionary Search: "What's that word that means....?"

Facebook Name Trees Match first names with last names.


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018


Saturday, July 23, 2005

I was watching Firefly on disc. Is it just me, or do the acts sometimes just go flying off in an entirely new direction from the previous act?

I've watched maybe half the episodes, and I have no idea what the template is. No idea what a "typical" Firefly episode is. No idea what the flavors of the acts are.

That's good and I also see why that made it harder to get an audience. It's good because you really don't know what's coming. Even on Buffy you could figure out where the episode had to go. There were surprises (he killed Jenny Calendar!!!!) but the act structure was fairly normal.

That means the story is more involving. You can't complete the story in your head. You really have to pay attention.

(Oh, yeah, and the dialog and editing are awesomely great.)

It also means that the audience has no idea what they're going to get. Very hard to get an audience that way. They know when they tune into Law and Order that in the first two acts the cops are going to catch someone, and then in the second two acts the DA's are going to put them away. They can just let the legalese wash over them like a warm bath. With the Joss, you don't have a clue what's coming.

I'm glad he's got a movie coming up. I wonder if he'll get a show after that? It's a much more ambitious show than Angel or Buffy, I think. Experimental and challenging. Can't wait for September.


I saw Serenity at a preview - it's excellent - I was taken by surprise more than once - thought the ending a touch predictable - but for the most part the movie was everything I was hoping for from the last 3 star wars flicks but never got.

I agree about how Firefly was more ambitious than Buffy or Angel - I was drawn into Firefly much quicker than the others.

By Blogger Nellie Lide, at 12:06 AM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

By Blogger Nellie Lide, at 12:07 AM  

its actually going to be a trilogy (yay!)

And all the swearing is in Chinese!

By Blogger Jason Sanders, at 3:27 AM  

Jason's right. The actors are signed to a three picture deal. (They'll make more if the first does well.) After/during that, Whedon has the Wonder Woman movie to do. He's writing that now.

No telling when he makes it back to TV. My understanding is that he still owes 20th Century Fox one more show, as part of a three show deal with them (of which Angel and Firefly were the first two). I think he had that deal frozen so he could spend some time making movies.

It would be nice to get more TV from him, but I wouldn't expect to see anything until after Wonder Woman. (Unless the Fox Network suddenly goes "Firefly! What a great idea. Let's make more!")

By Blogger Erik, at 1:18 PM  

I hope they (FoX) don't try to force a crappy show out of Mutant Enemy, that would really suck...

I believe Universal owns the Firefly rights now, since their making their movie. Anyone have any info on this?

By Blogger Jason Sanders, at 2:34 PM  

The more I watch it, the more I think Firefly is TV for TV people. It mucks around in the old genres that television forgot and, by lambasting them, winks at their absurdity. The writers seem so versed in the accepted conventions that they’ll make two separate genre interpretations of a single premise or new character, and once the first looks like it’s about to be resolved, they jump straight to the opposite and make it fit.

This is the equivalent of Indiana Jones shooting the swordsman in ROTLA not because it was funny and unexpected, but because Harrison Ford had the trots and didn’t have the patience for the usual (and originally scripted) elaborate sword battle. The beauty of Firefly’s writers is that they found a way to script this effect.

Genre plots are so ingrained that you can’t really get rid of them. It seems like Joss & Co. were fond of the bait and switch: you think you’re watching a “submarine story” (stock scifi plot) when really you’re watching an origins/love story (stock wagon train plot); you think you’re watching Mal the reluctant husband teach his young bride to be a strong woman in the frontier (stock Dr. Quinn-type) when really she’s a black widow and the whole crew has already been caught in her literal net (stock spy intrigue, but it’s not what we thought we were watching). The stakes for each genre interpretation are different, and the act breaks you mention are the moment when they pull out the rug and tell us what we’ve really been watching. It’s a good surprise, but I have had a suspicion that it only really works with people who are similarly well-versed in what to expect from genre TV.

I’d say that if there is an in-story template, it is that everyone is looking for the shortest path to a simple boring life, exemplified by the very stock 70’s western beginnings to each episode. The real premise, though, is that nothing can be what it seems. The only constant I’ve seen is that the desperate selfishness of the people Mal meets will inevitably get in the way of his own selfishness, and if Mal does the conventionally “right” thing by showing mercy, by God he’ll be punished for it, and the new problem won’t be resolved until somebody on Serenity breaks the rules of engagement and change the odds in their favor long enough for them to run away.

Joss said in creating Mal that he wanted to play situations through a person that he himself wouldn’t like to have over for dinner. With a self-proclaimed lack of core beliefs, Mal has the same freedom and uncertainty the audience has in watching him - in that he’s never sure what he’ll do next. This also frees Mal from many of the rules of television (and the great tradition of heroes) that say a hero can’t act a certain way; Mal can cheat. His personal narrative is not that of a hero. He’s just trying to keep running and doesn’t see himself as accountable to anyone’s needs (or morality) but his own and, to his great surprise, those of his crew. I think this unpredictability of character freed the writers to take a few more left turns with the plot and tone, and their challenge was to still make Mal the “all right” guy at the end of every tale.

The greatest joke is on the audience and our expectations from all the years of bad TV we’ve watched.

By Blogger Jeff Burright, at 7:08 PM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.