STEPHEN GALLAGHER, PART TWO - Complications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty TV and Screenwriting Blog




Baby Name Voyager graphs baby name frequency by decade.

Social Security Administration: Most popular names by year.

Name Trends: Uniquely popular names by year.

Reverse Dictionary Search: "What's that word that means....?"

Facebook Name Trees Match first names with last names.


Archives

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

 

Monday, September 26, 2005

My interview with Stephen Gallagher, continued.

COMPLICATIONS ENSUE: I gather non-writing producers have more power in the UK?

SG: It's rare to find a producer with writing skills. Occasionally a writer makes a splash with a hit show and gets to be an Executive Producer on the next project, but with a few exceptions it's a vanity credit. One of the exceptions would be Russell Davies, who's effectively the showrunner on the Doctor Who revival. But I could probably name you dozens of the other kind.

COMPLICATIONS ENSUE: I have the impression the British system is more about small blocks of episodes completely written before they shoot, often by small numbers of writers who slave to get it all perfect before it goes to camera. If so, doesn't that create a lot of work for everyone and piss off the audience when you can only get 6 episodes of Coupling a year? (It took us 7 episodes to figure out the template for Naked Josh, and we only had 8 first season, damn it.)

SG: Every now and again you'll get a British TV executive fulminating over how British writers resist team writing and how they're singlehandedly responsible for holding back our television drama. But their own business model isn't about hiring writers, it's about buying stories, and as long as that persists then British writers are always going to be a bunch of spiky loners.

One of my favourite British shows of recent years was Jonathan Creek, a detective drama about the odd-couple pairing of a scruffy, lateral-thinking magic assistant and a dysfunctional true-crime writer who drew him into unsolveable cases. If ever a British series cried out for the creation of an inventive writing crew sparking off each other under the close direction of the show's creator, it was this one. It had the feel of something that could really have gone the distance. But instead they never made more than six of them in a year, all penned singlehandedly by David Renwick. Before the second year was out the cracks were showing and the inventiveness was flagging. Series four and five were down to three episodes each and the show felt dead on its feet. A real shame because at the beginning, it was great and the potential was always there. Renwick could have run a great ship but he just stayed chained to the desk.

COMPLICATIONS ENSUE: When you're creating a show, do you write a spec pilot or a bible or what? How much do you write before taking it to a producer or network?

SG: Experience suggests that if you want a producer to pick up your idea and run with it, a descriptive proposal is best. Premise, setup, characters, story. Then they feel they're being involved from the ground up. If you show them a spec pilot it's like you've started the party without them. I find a useful compromise to be a proposal plus the first ten to fifteen pages of the pilot. If you've written the first act and you still haven't proved that there's a show there, then there's no show there.

As far as the network people are concerned, they'll only greenlight on the
basis of at least one fully developed script.

To be continued...

Labels:

8 Comments:

Really good stuff. There are so many screenwriting blogs out there where one can learn all about the American system whereas this is the sort of stuff I really want to know.

Thank you both, Alex and Stephen, for this.

Rather surprising cliffhanger, though...

By Blogger Lee, at 12:16 PM  

Very interesting Alex, thanks for posting this. Quick question... where's the rest of it? Surely there's more, it can't end on "develo". Can it? :)

By Blogger writergurl, at 12:30 PM  

The point about small episode blocks is well made, as it's both the blessing and curse of UK TV. Clearly it's completely inadequate for a procedural like Jonathan Creek but, on the other hand, it's the system that's given us the dramas we can be most proud of. Without that method of doing things there would have been no Singing Detective, Boys from the Blackstuff, or any one of the countless, brilliant dramas all the way up to today's Holding On and Conviction.

I'd hate to see us develop a team-centric production ethic at the expense of such unique visions.

By Blogger Lee, at 1:47 PM  

At the Showrunners event that I mentioned earlier (see comments to part 1 of the interview) the guests from the US all expressed envy of some of the more 'handcrafted' products of British TV and of the fact that we don't necessarily have to come up with an idea that will run for 100 episodes.

Of current British drama they were unanimous in admiration for SPOOKS (retitled MI5 for the US).

By Blogger Stephen Gallagher, at 3:17 PM  

I like Spooks. It's a little bit like Law and Order and NYPD Blue, in that it can run forever and ever with a constantly rotating core cast, unlike, say, Monarch of the Glen or Ballykissangel, which lose their spark when the original leads move on.

By Blogger Lee, at 6:36 PM  

So how come Steven Moffat gets to write Coupling all hisself? Married to his producer?

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 11:06 PM  

It's a tradition, or an old charter, or something; a holdover from the days my grandparents gathered around the wireless for their yucks.

The BBC is nothing if not reliably conservative.

Of course, they just might not have enough office space to accomodate writing teams.

By Blogger Lee, at 4:29 AM  

Spooks is possibly the closest thing you'll get to team writing in British TV (other than soaps) - the writers get together with the producers to hammer out series arcs and some storylines before starting the writing process. My impression is that this is partly down to Kudos deliberately trying to emulate US-style teams. However the creator, David Wolstonecraft, isn't a showrunner in the American sense and has no producer-type power. Which probably explains why he doesn't write episodes any more.

By Blogger mark g, at 6:47 AM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.



This page is powered by Blogger.