SWORD V. ARMOR - Complications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty TV and Screenwriting Blog




Baby Name Voyager graphs baby name frequency by decade.

Social Security Administration: Most popular names by year.

Name Trends: Uniquely popular names by year.

Reverse Dictionary Search: "What's that word that means....?"

Facebook Name Trees Match first names with last names.


Archives

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

 

Sunday, September 04, 2005

I'm struggling at the moment with the reality of medieval armored combat. (I like a job where this sort of conundrum comes up.) It's clear that bodkin arrows will punch through armor. By the same token, I can easily imagine the dagger point of a halberd punching through plate armor, not to mention chainmail, with the full weight of a knight focused on one sharp point. But how on earth did knights do any damage to each other with swords?

In period stories, you read all about knights splitting each other's helmets in half with a good stout blow. But it's hard to imagine in reality. Yes, a sword functions pretty much the same as an axe, focusing all its cutting power on wherever the blade hits. But if you took an axe to, say, a steel frying pan, good luck doing more than denting it. So, either people's helmets were made of far inferior metal (possible). Or, plate armor is not as thick as your basic steel frying pan (possible). Or, the stories are full of it (definitely possible).

You also read about Richard the Lionheart being able to crack an anvil with his sword, while Saladin could slice a feather in midair with his. That's definitely hyperbole. Ask anyone who owns an anvil. Maybe the swords were just for putting down the peasants, and knights hit each other with maces. On the other hand, you do see armored guys in medieval paintings with swords sticking out of them...

5 Comments:

I think I remember reading that against heavily armored sorts, swords were largely used as heavy hunks of metal good for bludgeoning people into exhaustion -- then stab at your leisure.

Also, I think that the actual wearing of plate armor in the field is mostly stuff for stories and paintings -- real soldiers had to stick with layers of chain.

By Blogger Steve Peterson, at 1:35 PM  

A four foot long sword weighing over five pounds, probably wouldn't have much difficulty cracking some types of armour.

You can get an excellent overview here. You want Type XV and onward, from about half way down the page.

By Blogger Lee, at 5:31 PM  

Alex, I think Steve is right, I think it was more a matter of knocking them out, or wearing them down, but, try checking with Jim over at

http://theawfulwriter.blogspot.com/

he is into Ren Fairs, so he might have more accurate information.

Also, for procrastinating research try this http://www.taleworlds.com/
cheers
Dave.

By Blogger Grubber, at 6:11 PM  

Well, you need a timeframe context here -- the swords changed with the times too, for as armor become more effective, the swords became stouter, more thrust-in for the weak spot cut...wasn't the big brandish, swing around style as much, all about the push thrust. Also of the big swords were for battle play -- cutting out the horses legs, and randomly swinging around in the warfare chaos, not really a civilian weapon. But like any military weaponry, it changed with the times, updated itself to be more functional to current tech. See some of the later 13th Century and Crusades swords, they are nearly pure thrust. To sum up: Swing at start, thrust when the plate armor tech increased.

Also, fyi, R. Ewart Oakeshott is one of the historical Subject Matter Experts within this field, I have a few of his books, look him up for more detailed analysis.

By Blogger Christopher Coulter, at 9:29 PM  

For a literate/literary take on medieval weaponry and recreational combat, skim T.H. White's "The Once and Future King." White had an uncanny ability to describe the equipment and techniques as though he had been a long-time enthusiast sitting in the benches lining the lists, making notations on the fight cards. For earlier descriptions, "Beowulf" has a fair amount of swordplay and helmet cleaving. The real experts today, of course, the creative anachronists.

By Blogger Marc in MD, at 8:43 PM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.



This page is powered by Blogger.