Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Game, TV, and Screenwriting Blog

Baby Name Voyager graphs baby name frequency by decade.

Social Security Administration: Most popular names by year.

Name Trends: Uniquely popular names by year.

Reverse Dictionary Search: "What's that word that means....?"

Facebook Name Trees Match first names with last names.


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018


Saturday, June 03, 2006

[POLITICS, BUT YOU SHOULD READ IT ANYWAY] You guys down in the States, not so much.

Rolling Stone has a compelling article by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., explaining how the 2004 election was stolen, with in-depth coverage of how the Ohio election was stolen.

I didn't think exit polls could be that far off. Turns out, they weren't. It was the vote reporting that did not match the vote counting, courtesy Kenneth Blackwell, Republican secretary of state for Ohio.

I thought I was tired of being outraged. But I'm outraged all over again. The US has a president who has twice won because the rules were bent in his favor. Doesn't that piss you off?

You can argue that Bush won the popular vote, not that that mattered in 2000, but I'm not sure he would have won that either, had there been a free and fair election.


Hang on. Hang on. Read Farhad in Salon first:


By Blogger DMc, at 11:36 AM  

I find the Salon article unconvincing. He claims that the Republicans were merely "incompetent" in arranging for 11-hour-long lines in heavily Democratic districts (such as Kenyon College) while suburban Republican districts had 18 minute lines. I call bullshit.

And Blackwell's attempt to invalidate Democratic voter registrations by demanding they be printed on cardstock was flagrant vote rigging.

Farhad's point seems to be, "Sure, they screwed a lot of Democratic voters out of their civil rights by illegal vote-rigging. But we can't be sure it was enough to swing the election." Well no, of course we can't be sure. Because those people didn't get to vote.

It's telling that Farhad starts his critique by saying "this is nothing new," always a sign that you're on thin ground. It's not the same as saying "this is nothing new and it has been convincingly disproven." but it means to sound like it is. Kennedy's points are new to me, and, I suspect, to most people who haven't got to read about them in the MSM because the MSM haven't bothered to raise a fuss about it.

I think the Republican habit of purging voter rolls in Democratic districts is a VERY BIG DEAL. So are (Republican-made) voting machines that record Bush votes when Kerry votes are entered. So are 98.59% voter turnouts in Bush districts. So is the Bushies declaring a bogus "FBI terror alert" to keep the media away from the vote count. The United States is supposed to have free and fair elections. Even Farhad agrees that the Ohio election wouldn't have convinced UN monitors had there been any. That SHOULD provoke mass demonstrations.

It is important to make sure that this NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN. It is unacceptable, after two elections in a row, to take the attitude that vote-stealing and vote-suppression and vote-rigging is all just "business as usual." That's how you get corrupt government.

A people gets the government it tolerates, and the government it deserves. And the people of Ohio -- and the US -- ought to be furious at they have allowed to happen to their government.

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 1:13 PM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.