Cutting the CBC - Complications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty TV and Screenwriting Blog




Baby Name Voyager graphs baby name frequency by decade.

Social Security Administration: Most popular names by year.

Name Trends: Uniquely popular names by year.

Reverse Dictionary Search: "What's that word that means....?"

Facebook Name Trees Match first names with last names.


American Amazon:

Canadian Amazon:

Archives

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

 

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

[Canadian Politics]

Using the recession for political cover, the Conservative Government has cut (or failed to cover) about $170 million in funding to the CBC. The CBC is responding by cutting 800 jobs and reducing the number of episodes of many shows.

Meanwhile, the CRTC is proposing gutting rules that require local news coverage and programming, and is considering giving the private broadcasters "relief" from Canadian content regulations.

I think Canada needs and deserves to have its own popular culture, rather than just being a cultural backwater of the United States. And that costs money. And I think the private broadcasters ought to support Canadian content in exchange for the protection they receive from US networks.

But the Conservative policies are also economically dumb. It's a dumb idea to cut government spending during a recession. The US government is spending trillions to provide a stimulus to the economy. Canada's is looking for ways to save money?

Meanwhile, gutting Canadian content requirements would amount to shipping Canadian jobs to LA. Instead of requiring Canadian broadcasters to spend some money in Canada (currently they spend about $1 on Canadian drama for every 12 they spend on US drama), they would be able to spend all their acquisitions money in the US.

Hey, I know! Let's abolish our automotive protections, so people can buy their cars directly from the US! Want to guess what would happen to any government, Conservative or otherwise, that tried that during a recession?

75,000 people have signed this petition to save the CBC. Maybe you could, too. And then you could pass it along to your friends.

Labels: ,

6 Comments:

There's a real irony in the idea that buying American makes a Canadian industry "more competitive."

By Blogger Lisa Hunter, at 5:31 PM  

Completely unrelated to the cut, I had decided earlier this week to start watching more Canadian television. So far, I'm PVRing little mosque, wild roses and being erica.

After, granted, a very limited sample, I have to ask, what am I missing here? Are these shows really representative of Canadian culture? Would more government funding really make Canadian TV any better? Put these shows side-by-side against the best from HBO or AMC - do they measure up? If not, is this a budget issue? I feel horribly guilty asking these questions, but I think we have to confront that Canada hasn't done as well as, say, Australia (similar sized market), in terms of telling our own stories. I'm not sure we can lay all the blame on SH.

I'm very happy to receive counter-arguments.

By Blogger leannet3, at 10:56 PM  

Well, you're missing SLINGS & ARROWS, THE BORDER, DURHAM COUNTY, CORNER GAS and TRAILER PARK BOYS, for starters.

And no, you can't compare to the "best of HBO." It is partly a budget issue. Our budgets are roughly 1/5 of HBO's budgets. They can pay actors more, so the most talented Canadian actors go South.

Yeah, more funding would make Canadian TV better. It doesn't have to come directly from the government. Requiring CTV to spend more money on domestic product would work, too.

But I think LITTLE MOSQUE is a show that you wouldn't see on US television (though I believe you now can). And so is THE BORDER. The differences are subtle, like the differences between the cultures, but they're there.

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 11:28 PM  

Canada has a problem that other countries do not, in trying to tell their own stories. A little someone to the south. Sure, all countries, especially english speaking ones, have the problem of competing with American culture, but Canada's problem is magnified by two facts. The first is that Americans sound, more or less, the same as we do. Speaking the same language is one thing, but Australians, English and others have a much different accent, and far more colloquial differences, than Canada has with the US. Most Americans on television and movies, simply don't sound that much different than Canadians do. It not only makes for less demand for shows sounding Canadian, it only highlights the difference in quality, which unfortunately there still is.

The other problem is that other countries' industries have been able to grow up more isolated than Canada. Sure, Hollywood has always been a big influence world-wide, but at least in, Australia, you felt somewhat isolated from it. When I lived there for a year, in my youth, you really felt far away from North America. They got American movies and television, but you weren't inundated with the media like you are here.

An example is the NBL. The Australian basketball league. They actually had, and still have, although I gather it's starting to suffer, a viable basketball league. It didn't have to compete with the NBA because the time difference, as well as the distance, meant that it was not easy to watch NBA games. You could never do that in Canada because any Canadian league would have had to compete directly with the NBA, an impossible task.

Things may have changed with the times, but when I lived there, they had a pretty vibrant film and television industry in Australia, and were able to build it simply because they were more isolated.

And while more government funding isn't necessarily going to crate better programming, what it does is allow talented people to stay and improve while staying in Canada. If there's not enough money in Canada, where do you think the most talented people will go? That's certainly not going to help the Canadian industry.

Imagine if people like Dan Ackyroyd, Jim Carrey, Michael J. Fox, James Cameron, Donald Sutherland and Ivan Reitman, had stayed in Canada, instead of having to go the US to make a living?

By Blogger Tim W., at 12:31 AM  

It's interesting (and sad) to observe Harper's tactical similarities to the Republicans'. This year, he's de-funding the CBC; next year, he'll be complaining about how broken down the CBC is. (And if the CBC's news coverage slides, then oh well.) It reminds me of Al Franken's line: "Republicans run on the idea that government doesn't work. Then they get elected and prove it."

My observation has been Canada's politics aren't as polarized as the US's. That's good and bad. One way it's bad is that a lot of liberal Canadians I know seem very indifferent to what Harper's doing. They loathe Bush, but when I point out that their Prime Minister is taking his cues from Bush, they're don't care or don't get it.

By Blogger David, at 8:34 PM  

All too true in some respects.

In others, it's that we don't know as a certainty exactly who and what we want to replace Harper with. Thanks to "first past the post" and other factors, that will continue to bedevil the country and benefit Harper and company.

By Blogger Dwight Williams, at 7:22 PM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.



This page is powered by Blogger.