FeedsComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog




Archives

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022

August 2022

September 2022

November 2022

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

July 2023

September 2023

November 2023

January 2024

February 2024

June 2024

September 2024

October 2024

November 2024

December 2024

 

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

I have set the site feed to "Short" which means to read longer posts, you actually have to go to the blog, rather than the site feed. Basically I want to see how this affects my numbers, since I don't think there's a way to tell how many people are reading the site in their readers. I will probably restore regular full feeds after a week or so.

Thank you for understanding.

Labels:

13 Comments:

As of right now you have 1,381 people that google knows are reading via your feed.

You can see this in google reader by clicking the details button at the top of the screen.

The other way to get stats is to use Feedburner, which was bought by google recently.

Set up a feed using feedburner, and then in blogger's feed settings, you can set the "Post Feed Redirect URL" to the feedburner feed, and you will be able to get stats on your feed readership.

By Blogger RodeoClown, at 7:20 PM  

I think that number above is purely people reading via google reader. Use feedburner and you can get a much better picture of who is reading.

By Blogger RodeoClown, at 7:21 PM  

When I go to Google Reader and subscribe to myself, it says only 129 people are reading via my feed. Where does it say 1381? I'd rather have 1,381 than 129!

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 7:47 PM  

I was looking at this feed URL: http://complicationsensue.blogspot.com/atom.xml

Although - I see on the side of your page you have a feedburner feed as well.

If you set it up in blogger, it should redirect the blogspot feeds to feedburner, and then you should get a grand unified readership count.

By Blogger RodeoClown, at 7:57 PM  

Blah...I come to the site via an RSS feed. I don't want to miss updates, because I generally don't scroll past each new post.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:05 PM  

I know you said you'd "probably" restore full feeds in a week or so, but I just wanted to add my vote for definitely restoring them after this test run. I too am a Google Reader reader, and I prefer to catch up on your blog from there (I'll sometimes visit the actual blog to catch up on readers' comments within each post).

Thanks for keeping us in the loop about this test run, and many thanks for your always-helpful blog.

By Blogger Brian, at 12:47 AM  

+1 for restoring full feeds as soon as possible. I don't generally click through. And as people say, if you want to get stats from web-based feedreaders, you can use Feedburner (which knows numbers because Google et al. report how many people they're fetching the feed for in the headers of their request to Feedburner).

By Blogger Michael Williams, at 1:02 AM  

I too totally recommend FeedBurner fro tracking your blog/reader traffic. I would of course like full posts in my reader but I don't think you're under any obligation to us. Content is king and if your great posts draw us into your page, well we'll be here.

By Blogger Unknown, at 8:48 AM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:37 PM  

Wow, way to help out, anonymized person. So considerate of you to sabotage my efforts. How about I just kill the feed entirely?

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 9:24 PM  

I'm not out to sabotage you, dear Alex. You are running an experiment: What will people do if you "shorten" your feeds?

Well, I'm part of the answer: Some people will just make themselves a full feed in order to continue reading you.

So, from my PPV your character specific want is me to stop reading you. You will do whatever it takes to stop me. You already have restricted your feeds. You see me as a saboteur, as if I was out there to get you. The stakes get higher, you might even kill your feeds. Will you stop writing in order to stop me?

But then your global want is to write and be read. You can't stop writing, and your life is based on other people reading and enjoying what you write. So your character is self-contradictory, your specific want is working now against your global want.

And therefore, ladies and gentlemen, complications ensue.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:59 AM  

No, I'm not running an experiment to see what people will do if I shorten my feeds. I am trying to find out how many people are reading my blog. By running an alt feed, you are sabotaging my effort.

Try to have a little respect for the guy who's putting the content up for free. If you want to read your own full feed, fine, but if you want full feeds restored, put your head towards helping me solve my problem.

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 11:27 AM  

Yes, I want to help you. I'm not your nemesis.

You want to know how many people are reading your blog?

Feedburner is all you need. I didn't mention that earlier as everyone else said that before me.

And I really respect you. As you can see from my previous response, I really try paying attention to everything you say. You should be proud.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:37 AM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.



This page is powered by Blogger.