FlawsComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog




Archives

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022

August 2022

September 2022

November 2022

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

July 2023

September 2023

November 2023

January 2024

February 2024

June 2024

September 2024

October 2024

November 2024

December 2024

 

Tuesday, June 08, 2010

Oh, and, here's another thing I'd like to see in RPG's: flaws.

In Role Playing Games, you get to portion out your character's various virtues. Strength, dex, intelligence, etc. All the stuff you used to allocate your character in paper-and-dice D&D.

White Wolf's RP game systems also asked you to choose character flaws. In VAMPIRE: THE MASQUERADE, you might have been sired while still wounded, so every morning you have to use blood to heal yourself. Or you could be crazy. Or haunted by a memory. The point was you were role playing a character, not just trying to max out stats.

Flaws make the man.

It would be interesting to put flaws into a console RPG. Make the player choose a flaw for his character. For example, your character panics. Faced with combat he might run away. Or run into combat prematurely.

Or, your character literally can't walk past an opportunity to gamble. You'd have to keep him away from gambling houses or he would find himself in a game until he lost his money. If he's within 50 feet of a poker game, he is drawn to it and can't do anything else until he's run out of money, or taken all the money. So he would have to avoid places that have poker games. (And there would of course be a mission in a gambling house.)

A character might have a phobia. He can take on monsters, but runs from animals. Or refuses to hurt animals no matter how dangerous or violent they are. Or goes into a berserk rage whenever he runs across a certain monster class.

Would that be fun to play? I would find it interesting -- it would put me more in the character.

I used to LARP. I wrote a one-night LARP called Camlann Eve where every player had a taboo, and if they broke it, there were serious consequences. And quite a few of them broke their taboos. (Hint: if you are forbidden to drink blueberry juice, check what the DM pours into your glass at the feast?)

On the other hand, players might just find it annoying, I guess, if they're trying to "beat the game" rather than enjoy it.

I guess you could offer it as an option -- either you must take a flaw if you're playing in hardcore mode; or, if you take a flaw, you get a few extra points in stats.

Would you be interested in a game that made your role-play your character more?

Labels:

5 Comments:

The problem with flaws as you've suggested them here is that they remove player choice. Take the "coward flaw", and the computer decides what happens instead of the player.

On top of that, the best way of dealing with flaws is to avoid triggering them--something that's likewise true of flaws in most RPG systems. Flaws in fiction are interesting because a character either overcomes them, or succeeds in spite of them--not when a character avoids them.

Really, the best option is to use some sort of achievement system to reward objectivly poor behavior. So if the character has the drunkeness flaw, he might earn extra Experience Points for taking on challenges when drunk. If a character has the "animal friend flaw", he might gain XP whenever he avoids harming a dangerous animal.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:24 AM  

A great RPG computer game is actually a White Wolf game. Vampire The Masquerade can be played through as a variety of types of vampires and they all have their own flaws which only serve to make the game more entertaining. There's also a possibility of frenzying, if the character loses too much humanity, you lose control and the computer pretty much takes over! Which can work out well, but it can also totally stuff you up, so its another added flaw.

So far as table top rpgs go a really great one is Scion, another White Wolf one, they really do encourage their flaws... And I'm lucky coz I have a GM who loves the pain and encourages us to play full flawed characters.

By Blogger Isobel, at 3:42 AM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

By Blogger ElwoodK_Rank佳玲, at 4:36 AM  

Flaws, in traditional games, are just more fodder for min/maxing. (i.e., Take a flaw to get that +3 build point and then try really hard to ignore it).

I would say you need to try Fate 3.0 system with Aspects and Compels (e.g., Spirit of the Century, Dreseden Files).

Or better yet try The Shadow of Yesterday (based on the Solar System) with Keys and Secrets.

For a good example try the Free RPG: http://www.onesevendesign.com/ladyblackbird/

By Blogger Mr. Moesy, at 1:03 PM  

Our group runs D&d in 3rd and 4th edition flavors. All the characters take on some flaw. Being perfect is boring. We had one character who could not stand being lied to. Unfortunately for the group he might not realize he wasn't being lied to. As soon as he detected what he thought was a lie (pure role playing, no dice rolling) he would go into a frenzy trying to hurt/maim/kill the person who lied. This is just one example, but it kept the party, and me the DM, on my toes. The role playing is usually the best part of playing. Combat is fun for a small bit, but the role playing, that's where the cheese is.

By Blogger Michael, at 12:12 AM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.



This page is powered by Blogger.