A DAY WITHOUT INTERNET, SORT OF - Complications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty TV and Screenwriting Blog




Baby Name Voyager graphs baby name frequency by decade.

Social Security Administration: Most popular names by year.

Name Trends: Uniquely popular names by year.

Reverse Dictionary Search: "What's that word that means....?"

Facebook Name Trees Match first names with last names.


American Amazon:

Canadian Amazon:

Archives

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

 

Monday, June 27, 2005

The combination of the cable modem being twenty yards away to the studio out back, and only slightly milder back pain than yesterday, means I have had a day mostly without internet. The good side of that is not frittering away my work time, though the treeware edition of The New York Times is almost as good for frittering. The bad are all the tedious little issues that I must either defer or ignore: can't download the right printer driver for the Photosmart 7350, can't look up when you should worry about a tetanus shot, can't use Screenwriter's online reference, what is Atasol and will it make me drowsy, and what exactly is the difference between a mangonel and an onager?

I finished the step outline for Medieval though. 40 scenes, more or less, which is probably about right. I would have preferred fewer but it doesn't feel like too much story; and it's the sort of slowly building thriller piece you can easily drop scenes out of.

I think this will be fun to write.

I'm slowly learning Screenwriter. I want to like it. But it is programmed differently -- for example the locations list is generated on the fly, so you can only eliminate a location from the popup list by removing it throughout the script. Pagination and scene numbering are likewise generated on the fly. The result is a program that takes a little getting used to. Final Draft feels more intuitive. On the other hand, Final Draft is full of annoying glitches. We'll see which I come out using once I've actually written a full script.

Which, if my better half really likes the outline, may be sooner rather than later.

5 Comments:

Just wanted to say that I am enjoying your book a lot. The straight talk is such a nice change compared to most screenplay books. Your breakdown of the inciting incident is wonderful. I'm looking forward to finishing the second half.

When will you write one for TV drama?

By Blogger John Donald Carlucci, at 11:57 AM  

Thanks, John. I'm almost done with Crafty TV Writing. It will be published next February (such is the glacial pace of the publishing biz) by Henry Holt.

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 3:44 PM  

What are your feelings on the use of "ing" in a script. A pretty hot debate has been brewing on Zoetrope concerning this issue.

By Blogger John Donald Carlucci, at 11:13 PM  

"Ing"? We're arguing about parts of speech now?

Style is style, I think. Everyone's got one. Depends on what you want to convey. "Ing" -- I have no idea what the debate is about, but "ing" denotes a continuing action.

Want to give us a link?

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 9:29 AM  

Here is a sample message from a long and heated debate concerning the use of "ing".

I'm asking you if this is an issue because this is the first I've heard of anyone having a problem (49 messages and counting) with this.

"In nearly every review I do, I have to bring up the 'ing' issue. There are rare tmes when it's okay to use it in a script, but basically, how I explain to people is that using ing verbs makes it sound like we're telling in a script what we're already seeing, instead of directing the actions, as writers are supposed to. We tell the actors what to do. It's our job. When using ing verbs, that's more of a commentary on things we're already seeing. That can be done on occasion to set up a scene so it's clear whether someone is already doing an action when the scene starts or not, but in some cases, it doesn't matter either way.

So I only use a rare ing verb when it's absolutely needed for clarity. I think it makes a script read a lot better to do it that way."

You have to join to view message board (free).
http://www.zoetrope.com/members/sub/sub_discuss.cgi?section_id=2&subject_id=60052&message_id=706972#706972

By Blogger John Donald Carlucci, at 10:36 AM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.



This page is powered by Blogger.