20 Aspiring Writers Walk Into a Room... - Complications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty TV and Screenwriting Blog




Baby Name Voyager graphs baby name frequency by decade.

Social Security Administration: Most popular names by year.

Name Trends: Uniquely popular names by year.

Reverse Dictionary Search: "What's that word that means....?"

Facebook Name Trees Match first names with last names.


American Amazon:

Canadian Amazon:

Archives

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

 

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

I've been sick as a dog for the past few days, plus organizing a Justin Trudeau fundraiser, so please forgive the silence.
Q. I'm in several screenwriting groups on Facebook, and saw a post about someone who is looking for a group of young screenwriters to write a script for their 1 hour feature. I've enclosed the entire post below -

"Myself and another director are shooting an hour of feature film drama and we want to do it very differently and try to help people in the process. We want to get a group of young screenwriters (20-30 or so) to collaboratively write the script for the film.

We want to give young unknown talent a chance to get some experience and some credits, as well as experiment with the wisdom of crowds to see how it makes the storyline evolve. The idea is to invite everyone to hold up at our studio for an all-nighter and write the thing in 24hrs, as well as modifying it online together. Everyone involved will get shared copyright, credits and be associate directors.
This sounds like an enormous waste of time for several reasons.

One, faster is not better. A good story takes time to take shape. You have to look at it from several angles. You have to work it. Every now and then you read or hear about how someone wrote a script in three days. They didn't. They thought about it for several months, until they knew exactly what story they wanted to tell, then wrote a draft in three days, then reworked it for several months.

Two, twenty heads are not better than one. A good story does not go down the predictable path. Storytelling by committee will get you the obvious ideas, not the clever ones that start out feeble and need nourishing into something surprising and spectacular.

Writing rooms do gather to break story and, later, to punch up jokes. But after you've broken the story into acts, you send one writer (or maybe a writing team of two, that functions as one writer) to beat the story out. And the showrunner story edits the beat sheet all on his own. There needs to be one controlling intelligence telling the story. Otherwise you just get a mishmash of ideas that might be good on their own, but which muck up all the other good ideas that other people have.

UPDATE: Lisa thinks this is a scam. If they ask you to contribute money as an "associate producer," run.

Labels:

6 Comments:

24 hours out of one's life to do some potential networking, maybe get a couple of leads, at least an interesting story or two out of the ordeal? Doesn't sound like a complete waste of time to me. What do you have to lose?

By Blogger daveednyc, at 2:21 PM  

The networking sounds worthwhile, as long as some of the aspiring writers are competent to trade critiques, or likely to eventually develop useful connections.

Something else that looks dubious about the ad to me is the shaky grammar. If the co-directors who wrote the ad are that poor with grammar – in an ad targeting writers – are they people an aspiring writer wants guiding their work?

"Myself" isn't sure this is a scam, but it sure doesn't look like a project with competent leadership. Yes, I know I'm showing prejudice based on writing. But the least they could do is proof-read their own ad.

By Blogger Steve, at 1:58 AM  

Hey Alex, Love the blog and may I say that your book "Writing inside the box" is the best book I have read on TV writing, so thanks for that!

I just watched ep 3 of FRINGE (and yes I totally agree with you by the way) and I thought, amongst other things, that the dialogue was pretty standard, and at times terribly "on the nose". I was wondering, after your post on last weeks episode, what did you think of this one?

By Blogger sghsfh, at 2:47 PM  

Sorry, just to add another bit:

Just finished watching the last 10 minutes of FRINGE... The latin gobbeldygook that the psychic artist intercepted may as well have been "deus ex machina" - In fact I'm pretty sure it was, just to stick two finger up at it's audience.

I'm sorry but there is aboslutely NO EXCUSE for how half-arsed that show is! It's so lazy. I can't believe that there are so many aspiring writers out there who don't even get a break, yet some utter gimp can get paid a fortune to churn out a second-rate x-files.

By Blogger sghsfh, at 3:34 PM  

I agree the writing of Fringe is poor but I was quite impressed by the cinematography of the first episode. Pity even that seemed to diminish in episodes two and three though.

By Blogger Dean, at 4:37 PM  

Networking with other wannabes isn't networking.

By Blogger blogward, at 10:26 AM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.



This page is powered by Blogger.