SCRIPT SCAMSComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022

August 2022

September 2022

November 2022

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

July 2023

September 2023


Monday, April 11, 2005

Just ran across this saddening article about agencies turning their query letters over to internet script hawking sites. You write a letter to Paradigm, you get a letter back from ScriptPIMP or ScriptShark or whatever saying they'll read your script for $150 and then if they like it they'll turn it over to a proper agency -- and take a cut of the eventual sale, if there is one.

If this is still happening, it's sad. WGA-signatory agencies are not allowed to charge for reading scripts, and this is a way of farming out the charge. Okay, it's not sending people to Syria to be tortured, but it's not too ethical. (Unethical behavior in Hollywood? I am shocked, shocked.)

$150 to reject your script does not seem worth it. Most people will reject your script for free.

UPDATE: But see interesting comments from readers...


Allow me to bring the reality of a new writer into focus.

I have used Scriptshark when it was run by founders Ed Kashiba and Roy Lee ( The Ring, The Grudge, etc ). The service they provided was professional and the recommendation I got from them opened many doors. I had no problems recommending the service until they sold Scriptshark to Ifilm and started to charge 10% of sales that was initiated by them.

That was several years ago, and now, Scriptshark doesn't charge that 10% anymore.

Would I recommend the service to a new writer? Yes, absolutely. Why?

No one worth pursuing will read a script from an unagented writer without a referral from someone they know and trust.

I can understand why a producer or agency will refer the new writer to services like Scriptshark. There is just no way an agency or a production company can spend the ressources necessary to review every submission that comes from an unproven writer. The sheer volume would make it impossible for them to even consider a fraction of those submissions. At least, those entities who send the writer to Scriptshark keep the door open. And should the writer's script get a "consider" or "recommend", it will be read. I know mine was.

Are those services for everyone? Obviously not. Scriptshark, for one, is very selective and gives either a "consider" or better rating to less than 2% of scripts they receive. So only good, market ready scripts will make it through the process. So it's a good idea to send only one's best work.

Costly? Yes, but if a writer is without contacts and he/she believes the work is up to professional standards, than it's money well spend. The coverage alone was worth it, imho, and he/she can get that needed referral.

Scams? Maybe. Most of these coverage/referral services are. So check them out, take time to verify their success stories, how long they've been in business and most of all use your better judgment. Fear and desperation are a writers worse advisors. So is paranoia. Other then that, some of these services can, if the writer's work is good, be his/her foot in the door.

Disclaimer. I have no affiliation with Scriptshark or any such service. And today, I'm represented by N.B. at Omada.

Hope this helps put things in perspective. That of a new writer.


By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:54 PM  

yeah, this happens. it happened to me when i submitted a script query to paradigm a couple years ago. i was pretty disgusted.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:20 PM  

From the Scriptshark site:

> Good material stands on it’s own.

Yeah, they're professional writers. (I hope no one reading this needs to be reminded of the difference between "its" and "it's".)

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:12 PM  

Who said they were writers? No one on their site, for sure.

Let me know if you ever find a writer who doesn't make spelling mistakes. I'd like to know more about this mytic creature. :)

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:13 PM  

Perhaps it makes more sense to pay a fee to a script-shark or than to enter myriad contests. Entering half-a-dozen contests might cost the writer twice as much as a basic package from Scriptshark...and doesn't generate feedback. I presume these services will tell the writer if the script sucks, and why.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:47 PM  

Used ScriptShark last year. Got a pass, but found the coverage professional and very very useful for the rewrite. If you are going to try a referral service, I'd recommend this one.

(this is a new anonymous, not the original poster)

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:23 PM  

used scriptshark and got coverage and notes for a script twice and the second coverage contradicted the first coverage and when I used the suggestions from the first person and put them in the script, the second coverage person told me to take them out. So I spent $600 for two different opinions. THANKS

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7:16 PM  

with a grain of salt......... in 1992 I submitted a script to Scriptshark and had the work critiqued....the script was a sequel to Death Race 2000 entitled Death Race II:2020 (it was somewhere around the 20th anniversary of the original film)... Anyway the critique read and responded (and I quote) "Who would be interested in making a such a film as we are close to the year 2000....... it would probably be a low budget project at best .... there wouldn't be a market for a cult film such as Death Race might consider writing Connon Ball Run, but then car films aren't that marketable anyway" .....

A couple of years later Fast and the Furious hit the theaters and the new age of the car genre was born..... by the way as to "who would be interested in such a film?" Try Tom Cruise (producer) and Paul Wes Anderson (Director) 15 years later as Death Race 3000 is in the works....

I know my script had some flaws (Dialogue is not my strong point....then again was there dialogue in Fast and the Furious?) ... but the point is there was a solid story and an idea that just might have flown if it was pitched to the right person even a few years later when the car genre had its rebirth throughout the '90s.....

I guess I'm wondering if Scriptshark has any true power or do they just collect the fees from hollywood hopefuls with no intention or ability to push a concept forward....

........that's finally off my chest!

p.s. Mr.Cruise or Mr. Anderson if you ever need a script for the sequel to Death Race 3000 I'll get a dust rag, polish one up and send it over ... ;)

By Blogger raycrx, at 8:29 PM  

Just my two cents but... As a writer, you are asking a production company to read your script and to make it. We are taking about millions of dollars to develop, shoot, and distribute a film. It seems to me that the writers investment of 150.00 is a pitance. You know?

If the work is good, it will go were you wanted it to in the first place.

By Blogger crazybilly, at 2:00 PM  

One of my scripts finished in the top 20 in three different script contests, including one second place finish with FADE IN Magazine. Scriptshark, not knowing about the script's history, gave it a pass and a sharp critique.

The trouble with these services is that they're looking TOO HARD for flaws, instead of just reading. You can see Sponge Bob in the clouds if you look hard enough and that's your goal. So my advice would be to get a consensus. One opinion really means very little.

Three of my books were rejected nearly 20 times by publishers, but all three went on to be published, and to stay in print for over 15 years (they're still in print.) One was an international bestseller and another was chosen by the editors of among the "Ten Best" of its kind published in the last several years.

Consensus matters.

By Blogger Unknown, at 12:17 PM  

WOW! Great blog I stumbled onto while researching script consultants. Great feedback from everyone who chimed in. I'm in the Screenwriting U Pro Series class (best class ever) and Scriptshark seems to be the service of choice, they offer several choices depending on need. I have a few others lined up and will possibly utilize more than one based on one of the comments above. Mu question is, what;s the deal with logline sites and site where you basically put your baby up for the world to see. I write a motocross- themed story in 2001 and had an early version of it up on one of the "Lit Sales" sites. Never heard from anyone regarding it yet a couple years alter I see Corbin Blue (or Cordon Bleu) making a motocross movie all over my motocross magazines with a storyline eerily similar to the early version I posted on said site. If I get a hold of a copy of this film and see it was "borrowed" from my putting it up there I will be the most prolific antagonist they ever saw. Social media is a bitch and it can work both ways for writers who register and show proof of p regression to a story and show it was posted on said site to gain interest, not to be ripped off. Any comments on this sort of thing Alex?

By Blogger ktm882, at 1:52 AM  

I wrote a script called "Living Nightmares" several years ago and had it registered with the WGAW. Found out recently that AMC ripped the title for one of there own films. Called the writer's guild to see what they could do and was told that it's perfectly legal for companies to rip the title of your work. Talk about some B.S.

By Blogger Unknown, at 4:26 PM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.