LET'S HAVE A BOOK BURNINGComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022


Monday, June 06, 2005

Human Events magazine has published a list of the Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th Centuries. Since this is a conservative weekly, you might expect the number one winner would be The Communist Manifesto, followed by Mein Kampf. The ones down the list are more instructive:

#4: The Kinsey Report, which told the world that almost everyone is a little bit odd sexually ... it was much better when everyone suffered alone, right?
#7: The Feminine Mystique, which suggested that not all homemakers were happy...
#10: The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money: John Maynard Keynes' 1936 book which suggested that the only way out of the Depression was through government spending... proved, I would have thought, by the WWII boom...

Honorable mentions:
Beyond Freedom and Dignity by BF Skinner: operant conditioning and how it affects everyone.
The Origin of Species: evolution, 'nuff said.
Coming of Age in Samoa: not everyone is as uptight as you are.
Unsafe at Any Speed: Badly designed cars can be dangerous.
Silent Spring: Pesticides aren't good for the environment.
Introduction to Psychoanalysis: There's something going on under the hood.
The Descent of Man: we're all a monkey's uncle.

Pretty much the books that defined the 20th Century, when you come to think of it. I hate communism, too, but it's telling that so many of the books they hate are scientific theories. The implication is that new ideas may be dangerous. Freud may be part hooey, but you don't get to knowledge without allowing a certain amount of hooey. And boy would I not want to live in a world where Rachel Carson had never written Silent Spring, and Ralph Nader had not written Unsafe at Any Speed.


It's amazing that they would come up with a list like this. Even a book as repulsive as Hitler's Mein Kampf could have been read and used to prevent Hitler from implimenting his evil plan.

If they put B.F. Skinner on there (as representative of the left), what about Ayn Rand (as a right wing author?) I think the only dangerous book is the one left unread.

By Blogger Lawrence, at 4:09 PM  

Interesting to see that John Dewey's Democracy and Education is more "harmful" than Das Kapital. Dewey proposed that schools teach thinking skills rather than dogma.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:37 AM  

Actually, Rachel Carson's anti-scientific diatribe against DDT led to a resurgence of malaria all across the world (but particularly in developing nations), and the DTT hysteria she caused is responsible for millions upon millions of deaths.

Here's a good article that refers to, among other sources, a tremendous New York Times editorial about this.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:24 AM  

Fascinating article. It's funny. I went to a conservative Catholic university and many of these books were on our required reading lists. Thanks Craig, you've introduced me to a great list of must-reads.

It's interesting what they have to say about the books, I only wish they had more explanation on the Honorable Mention list.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:44 AM  

Fair point about Silent Spring, but at the time, everyone was touting DDT as a panacea, and no one was noticing what it was doing to the environment. The careful application of DDT to inside walls they're talking about in the Times article is fine; at the time, US farmers were spraying DDT from airplanes, it was getting into the water table, and all the birds were dying, e.g. the bald eagle.

Silent Spring might not have been perfect, but that wasn't its job. Carson's job was to wake people up to the dangers of indiscriminate pesticide use. Dow Chemical had enough publicists on its staff to defend itself. We needed a new perspective. In the long run I think Carson will have done everyone a service, even if, absolutely, there is always a people cost to protecting the environment.

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 11:53 AM  

Yeah, except DDT wasn't hurting or killing bald eagles. That's the problem. Rachel Carson's book simply was inaccurate. Mind you, I'm not a nut. I like birds too. I also like people. What I hate is bad science. When people get hysterical about some alleged danger (like Ms. Carson), they might as well be book burners or fundamental wingnuts.

Anyway, here comes the science.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:59 AM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.