Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022

August 2022

September 2022

November 2022

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

July 2023

September 2023

November 2023

January 2024

February 2024


Monday, August 07, 2006

We just watched Animal House for the first time in, oh, ten years, and boy that movie holds up. Brilliantly silly script, brilliant performances, great dialog ("Hey, you f***ed up! You trusted us!"), great soundtrack.

On the other hand we tried to watch Caddyshack the other day and couldn't get through it. A lot of comedies from the seventies and eighties fall flat, others survive.

What makes a movie work then and flop now? What's different about the movies that hit then and still work?

A lot of the ones that fail seem belabored and slow, while His Girl Friday's pace certainly helps it now. The Marx Brothers work great, W. C. Fields seems like an artifact of another time.

Is there any way to divide up comedies that still work and comedies that don't?

And while we're at it, did Abbott and Costello know what they had when they came up with "Who's on First"? Did they know they had a classic, or did it just seem like a gag that might be good for a few laughs?


"Wormer, he's a dead man! Marmalard, dead! Niedermeyer..."


I showed Animal House to my eldest daughter last year and she got it/liked it...but I kept expecting a bigger reaction (...isn't it great?!)

I'd be curious to know why Caddyshack didn't hold up for you (still works for me)...

And I'm sure Abbott and Costello were just churning out schtick as fast as they could...feeding the machine, and had no idea what might make a 'classic' bit.
Does anyone at the time?

By Blogger wcdixon, at 12:16 AM  

The Universal Monsters still work for me, despite (or because of?) the b&w...

So much cool design work went into those movies.

By Blogger Cunningham, at 1:19 AM  

Well Animal house lived up to its billing when it was filmed here in Eugene, Oregon, during its heyday. Gosh, don't you just miss it when the original AH frat in the movie was displaced by an office building!

Caddyshack worked for me, by Caddy II for some unknown reason, didn't settle with my appetite to well, well sorta.

By Blogger Jeff, at 4:20 AM  

Without any research or a shred of evidence to back up my assertion, I'd suspect that the "Who's on first?" routine was the end-product of a long line of vaudeville evolution. Not the exact same sketch, but the principle of confusion wordplay and growing exasperation.

Some performers are terrific talents. Others are modest talents but terrific workers. I reckon the first bunch mean something to every generation, the second tend to fade over time.

By Blogger Stephen Gallagher, at 4:35 AM  

“Who’s on First?” is not original to Abbott and Costello. It is an old vaudeville routine that they simple made famous. The Marx’s brothers will always be funny because of their use of language. “Fat, Drunk and stupid is no way to go through life” from Animal House is how I live my life.

By Blogger DJ, at 9:57 AM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

By Blogger John Deckard, at 11:56 AM  

It seems to be about pacing and the evolution of the genre after the original movie. W.C. Fields and Rodney Dangerfield (for me) feel so slow and hammy, it's hard to wait for the punchline to come through. I often 'get' the bit way ahead of the action, because their humor is often situational and they've been done to death. There are, however, a few, older W.C. Fields shorts that are still pretty funny.

The other thing can be the evolution of comic stylings after the original. Harold Ramis, Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd and Chevy Chase did their thing for years (and still do). Their stuff has been copied and cultivated over the years to the point where some of the bits just feel old when you go back and watch them. The immitators of Animal House, for the most part, have been pretty weak, partially because that original cast was so perfect for the writing.

As for Abbott and Costello, they were big fans of Samuel Beckett, the playwright who wrote Waiting for Godot whose plays where composed of highly-distilled dialogue that was brutally-funny and absolutely pitiless. Abbott and Costello's vaudeville bits had a tremendous amount of craftmanship behind them, regardless of whether their humor was your cup of tea or not. I can appreciate their stuff, but personally, "Who's on First" is one of the few bits of theirs that enjoy.

By Blogger John Deckard, at 12:00 PM  

Amazing... I actually wrote a blog about comedy being a generational thing just a few days ago.

Your comment about comedies of the '70s and '80s is right on the money.

I rank Flying High/Airplane as one of the 5 funniest films ever made. My partner Dr J just doesn't think it's funny at all.

But it goes further than generations, or even the passing of time. Wag the Dog is just sheer brilliance, but I suspect it's only a masterpiece if you've got some inkling of how the media and/or advertising and/or film and/or politics actually works.

By Blogger Chester The Bear, at 4:04 AM  

Blutarsky, zero-point-zero!

By Blogger Fun Joel, at 10:55 AM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.