All Your Quirk Are Belong To UsComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022

August 2022

September 2022

November 2022

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

July 2023

September 2023

November 2023

January 2024

February 2024

June 2024


Thursday, September 20, 2007

DMc blogs:
This morning Russell Smith in the Globe & Mail has an interesting column about U.S. cultural quirkiness, which riffs off an article by Michael Hirschorn in this month's Atlantic. It's interesting because, of course, quirky for quirky's sake has traditionally been a Canadian film and tv development ... uh ... quirk.

I can't help wondering if the whole Quirky Art thing is a residual impression, like the raft of "alcohol-infused incest and abuse in a small dying fishing town" movies that DMc and I like to rail about. Slings and Arrows isn't quirky -- it's a straightforward comedy about quirky people, just like, say, 30 ROCK. Corner Gas, ditto. LITTLE MOSQUE, ditto. DE GRASSI: THE NEXT GENERATION is not quirky at all, is it? (I dunno, I don't watch it.) WHISTLER? Not quirky. I could go on.

And the last small dying fishing town movie I saw was the adorable LA GRANDE SEDUCTION which was about a small town trying to snooker a Big City Doctor into moving there. Nary an incest or an abuse in it. All the drunkenness was happy funny drunkenness.

In fact, since I moved to Montreal in 2000, I have not run across any serious quirkiness in either the TV or film industries. TRAILER PARK BOYS is, sure, about very quirky characters. But it is not a quirky show. It is a mock-documentary that uses classic story structure. The Boys want something. They concoct a dumb scheme to get it. Complications Ensue. TPB is, essentially, a cross between THE THREE STOOGES and I LOVE LUCY, updated via THIS IS SPINAL TAP.

There are art films, of course, but I would call Atom Egoyan cerebral, and Denys Arcand a tad bombastic. Not quirky. The Coen brothers are quirkier than Atom Egoyan, and Oliver Stone or M. Night Shyamalan can give Denys Arcand a run for his bombast any day.

Is it possible that Canadian storyteller, in fact, moved on from teh quirk years ago? And we're too Canadian to admit that we have, like the man who claimed to have been turned into a newt, "got better"?

UPDATE: Bill Cunningham comments:
If your show has quirky characters then by definition it is quirky. You can't separate character from setting and say it's not quirky
I disagree. Let me try to clarify.

30 ROCK is a sitcom. All sitcoms have quirky characters.

But they are going for the laughs. The jokes are not quirky jokes. They're mainstream jokes. Funny jokes, often, and even when they're not funny, they're meant to be funny.

Whereas what Denis is irked at, in his comments below, are quirky show: rather than going for the laughs, they are going for the chuckle. Sometimes the squirm. They'll settle for an intelligent nod. They're either afraid of going for the laugh, or they can't get a laugh, so they settle for the wince, or the bemused "wtf?" frown.

That's a quirky show.

One of my favorite quirky shows, because it only used quirk as a jumping off point, was NORTHERN EXPOSURE. The characters were indeed quirky. But the plotlines were also quirky. You weren't always sure if you were supposed to laugh or what. We saw the dramatic sides of comic characters, and vice versa. Sometimes it got philosophical. At least once it broke the fourth wall and got all meta. That's quirky.

When you don't know what the hell they're going for, but you're pretty sure the storytellers had something in mind, it's probably quirky. Does that make sense?



Alex, you can't point at all the successful examples and say, "see we've moved on."

Of course there are successful examples -- and yeah, they're post quirky for the sake of being quirky.

that doesn't change the fact that the Q word is the single most common adjective thrown around in development meetings -- especially comedy development meetings. And it's often used to hide the only sin -- that the shows aren't funny.

Talk to Rob Sheridan or someone who is taking many of those meetings. The Q is alive and well. We must, therefore, kill it.

And anyway -- Montreal is totally over the quirky, ever since Duplessis or at least that guy who actually lost a leg to the flesh eating disease.

Jesus, that's quirky.

By Blogger DMc, at 1:29 PM  

I don't mind quirky, as long as it's simply not for quirky-sake. A lot of Canadian film and television used to do this, and it drove people away in, well, droves. I think the lack of quirkiness is a sign of an industry growing up. No longer is the industry trying to show everyone they aren't American. Now they are simply trying to tell stories. And people are finally starting to watch.

As for Atom Egoyan, I've seen just about every single movie of his, and, to me, he epitomizes what has been wrong with the industry. All his movies seem to deal with the same subject matter. They are almost all overly serious, involving bizarre sex or depraved behaviour in one way or another. We get it Atom. People are strange and depraved and have secrets. And no one wants to watch your movies. Get the connection?

Rant over.

By Blogger Unknown, at 1:30 PM  

You know, I went back and forth about mentioning examples of the dreaded Q because I'm trying to practice a "if you can't say anything nice" strategy about Canadian tv these days. But I'm sure your Canadian readers could more than fill in. Think about all those shows on Comedy, Showcase, CBC, CTV - even Global in the last little while that were Q in spades.

I'll start with one...

Jeff Ltd.

By Blogger DMc, at 1:31 PM  

If your show has quirky characters then by definition it is quirky. You can't separate character from setting and say it's not quirky.

By Blogger Cunningham, at 2:19 PM  

I think a lot of our current bad Canadian TV is the opposite of quirky - it's trying hard to emulate something conventional but ends up having watered down stories, characters, and production values. That's not quirky, unless you mean the unconventionality of making a comedy that's not at all funny, or a drama with no dramatic tension.

I don't think Jeff Ltd. was quirky, it was just bad. It felt like a more adult attempt at the humour of Two and a Half Men minus a Man and a Half.

Robson Arms is pretty quirky. The Jane Show was definitely quirky. I like(d) them. But our big successes, Corner Gas, Little Mosque, Canadian Idol, Rick Mercer, are all decidedly conventional.

And I agree with Alex - quirky characters don't make a quirky show, or most American shows would have to be called quirky too.

By Blogger Diane Kristine Wild, at 4:40 PM  

the point is that quirky is the last refuge of the scoundrel in Canadian arts and letters. it's either said by people who don't know what funny is, or as a weird justificaiton for something that misses the mark but is "supposed" to be funny.

Miranda July is quirky and engaging.

It's a debased word in Canadian culture. We must stamp it out and make it politically incorect.

Quriky makes the baby jesus cry.

that is all.

By Blogger DMc, at 12:26 AM  

Oh, I get it now...

You say "quirky" when what you really mean is "bad."

By Blogger Cunningham, at 11:44 AM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.