Budget from Outline?Complications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022


Thursday, January 29, 2009

Q. I have the ability to direct movies without scripts but just outlines. I can schedule and budget on the basis of an outline and then complete the production. So far all of my productions have followed the same pattern. Is it impossible to find investors for such kind of film-maker even on low-budgets in the US?

Okay, let me clarify that a bit. I am not sure Henry Jaglom has scripts. He seems to shoot a great deal of improv and then edit. And there are other directors who have shot pictures that way; a lot of experiments were done in the '60's and '70's.

And, of course, "reality" tv shows have outlines, but no scripts.

So if your selling point is that you like to let the actors improvise, you may be able to get away with it. But it's a hard sell. Buyers can't see what movie you're planning to make. There's no way to tell if the comedy is funny, if the romance is suave, etc. They have to trust that you can direct the hell out of your outline.

What you would need to finance an outline would be at least one and hopefully several brilliant finished movies made the same way, without a script. And you would probably have to show that these movies have made money for their investors.

Unfortunately, now is just about the worst imaginable time to try to get new investors. The credit crunch has dried up all the loose money. I'm not sure investors are in the mood for experiments right now. I'm not sure audiences are, either.



Investing-wise, I think now is actually a good time. Well...it's complicated and depends on the person. Obviously no-one is going to want to throw money at a film at the moment, but what if there's a strong chance they will make money back or at the very least, cut even.

That's what we're doing for Michael's Resignation (http://www.michaelsresignation.com/).

Instead of asking for money from big companies, like the UKFC over here, we're getting fans on facebook and asking them to invest in the film. They can buy as little as 1 share for £1. So that way, they don't really lose anything and if we make £100,000 from the film, they get £2 back

Something for everyone to think about. Because for some people in the community, they'll see the chance to invest in a movie as a preferable way of holding onto their money (rather than sticking it in a low interest bank account).

Just something to ponder on for everyone out there. Of course it's going to take a while, but you never know.

By Blogger Neil, at 10:56 AM  

Even Mike Leigh has problems raising the finance he needs, and that's with his terrific track record of improv-based movies.

His method's about as proven as you can get but it it demands a lot of faith from his backers and -- perhaps even more importantly -- from his production guarantors, who'll have to carry the cost and complete the project if any part of it falls through.

By Blogger Stephen Gallagher, at 3:19 PM  

Yikes -- and how would the production guarantor take over a Mike Leigh movie?

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 4:28 PM  

There's a good discussion of Leigh's financing process in an interview with his regular producer, Simon Channing Williams, in this listen-online edition of BBC Radio's THE FILM PROGRAMME:


By Blogger Stephen Gallagher, at 4:32 AM  

From the point of view of someone who chooses to invest in odd things, there is really only one piece of information needed.

The person said they've made several films using this method.

The only thing that really matters is what ROI the investors got. (eg: Did it take 8 months to make their original money back, then have 2 years at 10% return?. Or have they not made back their investment yet?)

If you have a history of making a good return on investor's money, then that changes things entirely. For a start, the people who invested in your last film with profit are likely to be favourable.

If you DON'T have a history of making a return on your investor's money, then you aren't really looking for investors .. you are looking for people to donate as a charity !

I know that unconventional filming methods (etc) are an additional issue, but given that most people don't really have a strong idea of the 'correct' method anyway, it might not be much of an issue.

Good luck,


By Blogger Mac Harwood, at 3:00 AM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:26 PM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.