Growing Up On GamesComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog




Archives

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022

August 2022

September 2022

November 2022

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

July 2023

September 2023

November 2023

January 2024

February 2024

June 2024

September 2024

October 2024

 

Saturday, April 03, 2010

Lisa was a TV kid. She watched tons of TV when she was a teenager. She says up to twelve hours a day in the summer. I spent a great deal of my teenage years playing wargames -- military simulations with dozens or hundreds of little chips representing units, and rulebooks that went to twenty pages in six point type. Oh, and I read a ton of science fiction.

I wonder how those experiences shaped the way we think.

My stepson watches very little TV; just a few shows he likes to watch with us as a family. He spends as much of his free time as we'll allow playing games. He is a voracious consumer of games.

I wonder how the game playing will shape him.

I have to think that watching a ton of TV, even bad TV, gives you some insight into how people's stories turn out. You start seeing patterns in how people behave. You learn to interpret what people are saying. That's something that Lisa's childhood watching TV must have given her.

I've written elsewhere about how computer programming gave me the habit of writing my screenplays in a very top-down way, structuring the story, then the acts, then the beats, and only then writing pages. I wonder if wargaming contributed too. I think I have a visual sense of story. I'm looking for a story's weaknesses. I try to shore them up, the way a general might shore up his defensive line. When I figure out a solution for a story structure problem, I can feel how it makes the whole thing stronger.

I must have learned something from playing all those wargames.

What is Hunter getting out of playing games? Back in my day you couldn't do much more than increase your thumb-eye coordination. But games have advanced immeasurably.

You're not going to learn the same skills as you do watching TV or reading novels. You're certainly not going to learn how to tell the difference between what a girl is saying and what she means from playing MASS EFFECT 2. NPC's in videogames still tend to tell the unvarnished truth, or failing that, a baldfaced lie. A bit of truth and a bit of lie? Maybe in the next generation. They still hire one actor to voice a character and another to do his gestures, so how much subtlety can you communicate? They still haven't got the mouths to sync up with the dialog convincingly.

But you will learn something about the cost of love playing HEAVY RAIN. Or PASSAGE. You get to test your moral impulses in FALLOUT 3. Yes, at a very simplistic level, but if you keep doing it, you learn something about morality, just as Lisa learned something about human character even watching prime time TV in the late 70's.

You learn (or so I read) dark things about society and the ends justifying the means from PATHOLOGIC. You learn weird things about fate and free will from BIOSHOCK, notwithstanding what Ubisoft überdesigner Clint Hocking calls its "ludonarrative dissonance."

These days kids don't seem to go out and play in the neighborhood. The boys play video games alone, and then they get together and play video games. An entire generation is going to grow up having learned everything they can learn from WORLD OF WARCRAFT and HALO and ELDER SCROLLS and various other games of the year.

As a parent, I worry about the bad lessons of games. Games make things too safe. Life will not tell you that you have picked up eight of the ten mithril hockey pucks hidden in this dungeon, or that your health bar is getting low. Life does not come with a walkthrough. Life cannot be reloaded from a save game.

But that is the point of games, after all. They're a safe place to experiment. When we watch Buffy beat the crap out of a demon, we're only worried to the extent we choose to get emotionally involved, and we can turn her off at any time, and anyway, she has core cast glow and can only be killed in a season finale. The point of reading a novel or watching TV is to see someone else go through stuff that could potentially kill us. The point of wrassling with your best friend is that he is not really trying to permanently damage you.

I wonder about the valuable lessons of games. I wonder what skills Hunter, and the other kids his age, who are spending fifteen or twenty or thirty hours a week gaming, will come out of childhood with.

He must be learning something. He can kick my ass in a wargame.

Labels:

8 Comments:

This theme of games as valuable individually is zoomed up a level in this TED talk. She talks about the 4 things that gamers are great at and how the skills of Gamers might be harnessed to save this world too.
http://www.ted.com/talks/jane_mcgonigal_gaming_can_make_a_better_world.html

By Blogger -j, at 4:39 PM  

"They still hire one actor to voice a character and another to do his gestures, so how much subtlety can you communicate?"

Just to play with fire --

-- I dunno, you tell me.

How much subtlety do Pixar movies convey?

Or how about hand drawn Disney movies?

I get the point you are driving at. But be careful when you can drive a truck through that hole in logic.

Animation has been done with separate voice talent and separate "mannerism" talent for decades to quite great effect.

I don't see why that would be a limiting factor for video games.

The limiting factor, imo, has more to do with the medium of video games itself. For the most part, they are not a storytelling medium. They can be used to tell a story, but it is not a crucial part of the experience. Gameplay is.

By Blogger James, at 8:15 PM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:43 PM  

from Baby Bones

I learned finer points about Risk and Monopoly by playing them on my pod against AIs than I did by playing them with my friends. It took about three days of playing against AIs for me to realize that I should skip my turn at the beginning of Risk if no opportunity presents itself and my neighbors are reinforced. For instance, I used to gamble on 4 against 2 or even 3 against 2. But after being punished by AIs, these days, I just collect my armies and wait for turn two.

In Monopoly, since it's a slow game to play with friends, I did not to realize how easy it is to land in Jail and how that makes the orange and red color groups the most landed on, and hence, the most profitable.

By Blogger yyyyyyyyy, at 9:31 PM  

When I was in Florida I woke up a couple of days to the sound of kids playing in the street. It was lovely and even more so for the fact that it's something that I -- condo dweller, 9th floor, downtown -- rarely get to hear.

Is it that rare for children to just play outside? That would depress me.

By Blogger DMc, at 12:19 PM  

If I'm learning about life from tv and videogames then something has gone wrong.

I'm thankful I spent most of my childhood days outside with my friends.

By Blogger velo, at 4:25 AM  

I spent most of my childhood reading books, plus playing RPGs and computer games. Granted, nowhere near as complex in the same ways as the present computer games, but the InfoCom games were pretty complex things in their own right.

Games teach a lot of lessons. They're very good at learning how to be goal-focused, but they're also great for experimenting with the limits of a system. Yeah, computer games are limited by their systems, but so is life: if I played soccer outside I could only go certain places, could get hit by a car if I ran into the street, was limited by parental constraints to some extent, etc . . .. I don't see a lot wrong with growing up on computer games. Human beings are going to be mediated by computers to one extent or another for the rest of our existence anyway. The computers are now, essentially, parts of us.

Still I'd like to make an argument that every kid should be encouraged to try out tabletop RPGs: there's no better space for interaction with a system that can be made to appear limitless, and for collaboration in a collectively imagined project. Also, because there's possibly no better way to note the different assumptions upon which every system is built, and how they can be changed - and therefore the system redeveloped as well.

By Blogger Unknown, at 12:12 PM  

When people talk about violent games I've often thought 'keep violence in games' -- better than violence in the flesh.

I think computer games just like physical games teach a lot. There's hand eye coordination, puzzle solving, and checking for snipers but also in the MMPORPG team building, delegation etc.

My only problem is they're so addictive!

By Blogger Hepworks, at 12:33 PM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.



This page is powered by Blogger.