Barking Up The Wrong TreeComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022

August 2022

September 2022

November 2022

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

July 2023

September 2023

November 2023

January 2024

February 2024

June 2024


Saturday, June 26, 2010

[Canadian politics]

Friend of the Blog Vince draws my attention to his letter to the editor of the Montreal Gazette objecting to the bean counters running the Canadian TV and film industry.

I don't think bean counters are the problem. The problem is the Conservative government. They are not incompetent. They are actively hostile to the idea that government should support and pay for the arts. Basically, the arts are either popular or not popular. If they're popular, they should be able to support themselves. If they're not popular (opera, ballet), let people who like them donate to them. Why should the taxpayer have to support them.?

Which is a perfectly legitimate, Republican point of view.

I disagree with it. I don't want Canada to become a cultural backwater. Every civilized country supports its own arts, with the exception of the US, which has a 300 million member audience and is the location of the international film industry (which is what the US film industry really is). I think culture is a public good akin to roads, defense, police, environmental regulation, safety inspectors and fire departments: it gives more value to society than individuals are willing to pay for. We tax everyone to create roads that some people drive on and other people don't, so what's wrong with the government taxing everyone to support a vibrant arts culture?

But the Conservatives disagree. And complaining to them is not going to be very fruitful, because their political philosophy is that government should not protect or support the arts.

The way you protect Canadian culture is you get a government of the left. In my province, Québec, for example, elections are run between the left-wing Liberals and the even-more-left-wing PQ. Culture (even English culture) is very well supported in Québec.

The way you get a government of the left is you convince the egomaniacs in charge of the parties of the left to form an electoral coalition. An electoral coalition is an agreement that if, say, the New Liberal Party candidate is ahead in one riding, the Democratical candidate will bow out and throw his support to his brother; and if the Democratical candidate is ahead, the New Liberal candidate will drop out and support him. An electoral coalition increases the representation of both parties after the election. You don't even have to agree to form a coalition afterwards; you just increase the number of MPs that both parties have.

The only reason the NDP and Liberals won't do it is because their leaders, want to destroy each other more than they want to govern Canada.

The egos of a dozen people are preventing the 67% of Canadians who vote left from having a majority left government.

Okay, I'll get off my soapbox now.

Labels: ,


2And I'll step up on it for a sec if you'll allow me.

First, thanks for the link.

Agree with your views almost completely. I have an issue with the PQ, though, and their single-minded agenda. We won't go there. That could be a loooong and involved conversation we might have one day -- maybe at one of the soirées.

Yes, absolutely, the arts are supported in Quebec, but I take issue with support for the English voice here. Don't mean to disrespect US history, but it smacks of taxation without representation -- and not just on the culture front.

That's my little nugget.

By Blogger Script Demon, at 2:24 AM  

I don't see government funding as an answer to the perceived dearth of Canadian arts unless the goal is to have propaganda and cronyism become the criteria for what is created.

If politically active government employees pick what is to be made then they will be unable to pick anything that doesn't mesh with their political belief system - be it right, left or off spectrum. Propaganda is propaganda even if you believe in it and it is morally repugnant to force people to pay for your message. And you cannot pretend there would be any balance if you also believe that the right won't spend big on arts and the left will.

Soviet era propaganda posters are dramatic and all but I don't want a repeat of that... and as influential as it was on film making, I don't think the world needs the next "Battleship Potemkin".

Now if the bureaucrats masquerading as art experts are picking what is to be funded without political oversight then it is just their personal tastes (coloured by their personal politics) and social connections that are being elevated over, and imposed on, the uncouth masses who are forced to pay for it.

Do Canadians really need more art like the Cloaca No5... and how many more films does Paul Gross get to make? Really, there is no thematic connection there... honest.

On top of the that, I wouldn't be so fast to sacrifice everyone in Canada's physical well-being on the alter of your personal aesthetic predilections. The problem with consolidating the vote for left is that the left has no working understanding of economics - where are the transfers coming from if every province is a "have not" province?

Sure conservatives corrupt the market system to their advantage- that is the primary function of the political machine and the left does it with just as much abandon. (This won't change unless we stop them from buying votes and selling regulations in a race to power... good luck with that.) The difference is that the left has less understand of what they are screwing up than the right does and tend to damage it more.

By Blogger Clint Johnson, at 10:18 PM  

Clint, you look like you're fairly young. Trust me, dude. The last few decades of the 90s here in Quebec were exactly as you describe: propaganda and cronyism sanctioned by a repressive regime. I'm just trying to balance the playing field with my little allusion to demagoguery in my film. And just to be clear, Quebec nationalism is just a backdrop in my story, not the main focus of it.

By Blogger Script Demon, at 10:32 AM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.