Culture of FearComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022

August 2022

September 2022

November 2022

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

July 2023

September 2023

November 2023

January 2024

February 2024

June 2024


Sunday, July 11, 2010

Lisa and I watched BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE, Michael Moore's thought provoking documentary that asks why Americans shoot each other at such an appallingly higher rate than any other civilized country.

He points to things like the lack of health care and a social safety net, and also to the culture of fear: nightly news that does its level best to make people scared of their world. (Especially other people. Especially other people who are black. But also killer bees. And Y2K.)

Lisa and I were talking about how US networks are filled with cop shows. Does that come out of the same nightly news broadcasts where every night there's another crime story? If you get your picture of the world from American TV, it's a scary world full of perpetrators and cops, and everyone else is a victim.

Moore contrasts the US culture of fear with the Canadian culture of listening to other people and trying to work things out. He walks through Windsor, ON, checking to see if people's doors really are unlocked. (Yep. They are.)

So: what happens if Canada doesn't support its own TV? What if, for example, CTV's application to the CRTC is accepted, and they no longer have to put any Canadian shows on the air. (They want to use "best efforts." Heh.)

I think the answer is: we get a lot of American cop shows trying to get us to feel that our world is filled with criminals and cops and victims. And if we get any Canadian shows at all, they are cop shows made for a US network buying cheap: FLASHPOINT, THE BRIDGE, ROOKIE BLUE, THE LISTENER.

And then we start to be scared of going out and talking to our neighbors, because our neighbors might shoot us.

And then, who knows? We start shooting each other?

Now, this post itself is a tendentious argument based on fear. (What do you want? I'm an American.) But I'm not sure it's wrong. Culture is important. Popular culture is the most important kind of culture, because everyone consumes it, not just the fancy folk.

As I've said before: culture is not a luxury good. It is part of the fabric of society, like roads, and water mains, and electricity. There's a good reason that every civilized country except the US supports its own popular culture. We should bear that in mind the next time they come around and ask why the taxpayer should pay for TV shows when we can get perfectly good TV shows like CRIMINAL MINDS and 24 and CSI from the US.


Excellent post.

By Blogger David, at 10:47 PM  

I enjoy the good thrill-or-kill like the next American (but don't worry, world, I don't go there in my real-world life) (well, not yet). My wife, however, chooses her scant TV viewing by deciding which "family" she wants to spend time with, and at the moment, her favorite family is the crew on Flashpoint. And it's hard to argue with her. I mean, solving a problem with gunfire as your last resort is a real challenge for American TV, and those darn Canadians pull it off week after week.

By Blogger rjreimer, at 8:05 AM  

I almost wonder if there are so many cop shows because Americans sub-consciously need to see "the bad guys" taken down two or three times an evening.

By Blogger Lisa Hunter, at 10:11 AM  

I'd naturally want more coherent studies on this, but my impression is that we really do generate our culture of fear (or, more properly, fearing the wrong things) via our entertainment and storytelling in the U.S.

One example I like comes from Mark Crislip, my favorite infectious disease doc. When people say "I don't know anyone who's died of the flu, so it must not matter that much," he points out that annual flu deaths approximately equal annual firearm deaths in the U.S., and that he (Crislip) doesn't know anyone who's died from a gun injury.

...but since people get accustomed to the idea that gun crime is common, it doesn't seem weird to them to think that getting shot and killed is a risk. Since we don't dramatize vaccine-preventable diseases (or car accidents, by and large), people don't internalize those as part of their risk narrative, and that does seem to really impact their decision-making processes.

By Blogger Alex, at 10:33 AM  

There's a great deal more to what you are talking about than there is space to expand it in your excellent post. From the perspective of selling content, shock has become a key product attribute. In fact, its quite interesting to consider how writers for some shows (like Dexter, for instance) grab this issue and go through it to get to a sort of meta-product. From the perspective of story-telling, however, something really bad is happening. The function that for far longer than video, cinema, printing presses or even written language has been preserving our knowledge of the world is (in the US at least) infected with Fear Itself. I have been thinking lately that this is just an instrumental reflection of the financial imperative: that is, since the process of buying content is so concentrated, there is the opportunity of using that control for propaganda. And the propaganda in the US case is, you need us with our jackboots, nevermind about the civil rights. But of course writing can often be multivalent, and writers who have to observe to work can be far smarter than their corporate patrons, so the results are quite mixed. What i think though is that writers who can ingeniously transcend the unidimensional policy messages have to penetrate through to the other side of the message, so to speak, rather than go around it---produce it in some form or other even if they then turn it inside out.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:30 PM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.