Likable v. InterestingComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022

August 2022

September 2022

November 2022

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

July 2023

September 2023


Thursday, March 03, 2011

On a certain script, I've been getting some feedback that amounts to two characters not being perceived as likable or worthy people. I've had various proposals on how to make these characters seem more likable or more worthy people.

While that note can be valid, often it is misleading. We don't have to like your main character and we definitely don't have to like your secondary characters. You have to make your characters people we find compelling. We have to root for them to succeed or fail, but rooting for them to fail is just as strong as rooting for them to succeed.

For example, we have a lot of sympathy for the Frankenstein creature, but we don't want him to survive -- he murdered a little girl! In Oliver Stone's NIXON, we don't want Tricky Dick to get away with it. But we find him a compelling, fascinating character -- a sort of monster himself.

Lisa and I were just watching Charlie Kaufman's BEING JOHN MALKOVICH. (And if ever the possessory credit should belong to the writer and not the director, this would be it.) John Cusack's character is not likable. He's a whiny loser of a puppeteer. Then he goes on to do things that make us hate him. Yet he carries the film. We care what happens to him ... and his punishment is very satisfactory, thank you.

In this particular screenplay, I couldn't give the main character more likability because of what he does. He has a profession we all despise and fear. And in the movie he does a very bad thing, and then covers it up. That's nothing I could change -- it's in the bones of the screenplay. Having him be nicer to his daughter or to "save the cat" would just piss the audience off -- they'd feel I was trying to weasel out of the character's essential badness.

I think I've cracked how to fix this particular screenplay. If I'm right, the answer isn't to make the main character more likable nor his girlfriend more worthy. Instead I'm making the girlfriend much more clearly crazy -- clarifying just where her insanity lies -- and showing more clearly how the main character is failing to understand her craziness. The solution is in making their flaws clearer and stronger, rather than giving them virtues they do not deserve.

When someone says your character isn't likable enough, the answer may not be in making the character more likable. There is something missing, but it may not be something you can solve by having the character take care of his aged grandmother. The solution is in making them more interesting. Make them more compelling, stranger, more distinct, more flawed, more human. Make them more someone we can't take our eyes off.

When someone asks you to make a character more likable, make them more interesting.



I have to completely disagree with your idea that the monster killed the little girl - excuse me, "murdered" her...

The monster clearly had no intent to harm her, and when he realized something was wrong he was immediately moved to panic. The monster is as much a tragic victim here as is the girl.

Yes, the monster's actions resulted in the girl's death, but he couldn't have known that. When he did realize it - it was too late.

I say manslaughter.

The evidence:

(This is what happens when you watch too many episodes of L&O while editing FRANKENSTEIN LIVES AGAIN!)

By Blogger Cunningham, at 5:52 PM  

Part of the time the "more likable" comment means "more interesting". But I think it really means "I don't want to see this person accomplish his goal." Some of the solutions might be...
1) Make the goal really compelling. In Malkovich, finding out what the heck is going on with the portal keeps us engaged. Since Cusack is the only way we'll find out what's going on, it'll keep us engaged.
2) Put someone worse nearby. In Goodfellas Ray Liotta is a bully and a thief, but DeNiro and Pesci are flat-out murderers. Compared to them, he's very likable. Same with Menace II Society.
3) Make the bad guy the underdog. Frankenstein's monster is chased by a mob. Cusack is in need of a job. Something about the lead being outnumbered or his goal seeming impossible makes us want to see the goal achieved.
3a) Have the bad guy fail at first. That uncompleted task makes the lead the underdog and we want to see that task completed.
4) Add another sympathetic - but not necessarily likable - character trait. The childlike innocence of Frankenstein's monster is identifiable and makes him sympathetic, even if we don't excuse the actions. This may be what you mean by making the flaws "more human."

A movie that uses all of these tools is The Professional. (Although that movie also has "save the cat" moments, too.)

Making off-putting traits more interesting often isn't enough. You can make the main character more sympathetic through the structure or

By Blogger Andy M, at 10:42 PM  

I agree 100% with the first two comments.

Also: "I couldn't give the main character more likability because of what he does. He has a profession we all despise and fear."

Nonsense. Dexter is a serial killer. Yet we empathise with him / like him.

Mr & Mrs Smith is a romance between two murderers - who murder people for money. Why do you want Mr & Mrs Smith to survive but not Frankenstein's monster?

Casino Royale (the new version) is about a guy who is out for bloodthirsty revenge - and he ends up blowing up an entire hotel -- killing everyone inside -- just to get one man. (The intended target doesn't actually die in the explosion and ends up dying in the desert! But the hundreds of staff in the hotel are massacred in the building's destruction due to James Bond's thirst for revenge)

It's always possible to make a character likeable / empathisable.

It might not be right for your project .. but it is possible.


By Blogger Mac Harwood, at 5:32 PM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.