Just BizarreComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022

August 2022

September 2022

November 2022

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

July 2023

September 2023

November 2023

January 2024

February 2024


Wednesday, September 12, 2012

I've been following Romney's attempts to blame the President for the unauthorized press release of a terrified embassy staffer, and failing to check out the supposed "movie" that provoked the riots.

Or, to be more accurate, the video clips which were the excuse for the riots. Even the most cursory glance at the supposed movie will show you that it is not a "movie" at all, but a laughably bad series of clips pasted together by someone who is unfamiliar with how editing works. The historical clips are of bad actors amateurishly lit in a studio, composited over generic Arabian footage, and badly dubbed. Any Concordia student could do a better job over the weekend with her iPhone and iMovie.

Seriously, look at the picture. Saturday Night Live actors wear more convincing makeup.

It mystifies me that anyone would consider this mishmash worth an angry tweet, let alone a riot. I would have to assume that jihadi elements spend a lot of time sifting through the Internet to find something, anything they can use to outrage their fellow citizens, because you would really have to go out of your way to find something this badly made. There are much better dubbed cat videos.

(Meanwhile, there are reports that the riots were staged as a distraction to enable a plot to murder our embassy personnel.)

I think the only proper thing to do, the patriotic and righteous thing to do, to show who we are as a civilization, is to turn this into the next Downfall meme. Okay, raise your hands: who's willing to be beaten to death by humorless fundamentalists?

UPDATE: The story just gets weirder and weirder. The apparent director of the movie is an American Egyptian of Coptic Christian persuasion, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, who is on probation for bank fraud.



"jihadi elements spend a lot of time sifting through the Internet to find something, anything they can use to outrage their fellow citizens"

Maybe those citizens were already outraged by the US indiscriminately bombing the shit out of their country?

By Blogger circadianwolf, at 10:42 AM  

I don't think we've bombed any Egyptians in the past 60 years. Do you mean when we bombed Qaddafi's forces with incredible precision and helped the Libyans liberate their country? I'd be surprised if the Libyans in general are mad about that.

But this is not a political blog, even if I do get carried away with myself sometimes, so if you want to argue about US foreign policy, please feel free to email me privately.

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 11:07 AM  

I'm astounded at the reaction to one incredibly horribly made "film". I didn't even make through the whole trailer, if that's what you want to call it. I don't see the point of the protests. No one would have ever heard of (let alone seen) the movie without the protests. Now everyone has. I don't deny people have reasons to protest against the US, but this is most definitely not one of them.

As for the film itself, $5 million budget??? Are you kidding me? Either someone was lining their pockets and saying it went to the film, or that was one of the worst distribution of funds I've seen. Did they spend ANY money on talent, because it doesn't look like it.

By Blogger Tim W., at 2:59 PM  

I pretty much agree with your assessment of the film. I have no doubt the filmmaker's motives weren't noble. But I'm really disturbed to see that he's now being interviewed by the police. He does have a first amendment right to say even inflammatory, stupid things. He bears no more responsibility for others' reaction to his "work" than Salman Rushdie does. But now, due solely to others' reaction, he is essentially being investigated.

By Blogger David, at 4:29 PM  

He's being interviewed by the police because he was ordered to stay away from computers for the duration of his probation, and he obviously didn't.

When you're violating your parole, and you thereby cause riots, you're going to get some attention from your parole officer.

Parolees don't have all the rights that ordinary citizens have. For example, they do not have an absolute right of assembly, either. They can't hang out with criminals. They do not have the right to carry guns. They do not have the right to travel freely. And so on. That's the deal you make with the government when they agree to let you out of prison a bit earlier than you deserve.

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 5:38 PM  

Well . . . sure, if you want to actually present fact-based details of the case. ha, ha. I hope parolees don't have to give up their right to party.

Nevertheless, I would still resist the idea that some piece of media (be it high quality or garbage) causes violence from others.

By Blogger David, at 4:41 AM  

There's a legal concept, I've been told, of "fightin' words." If you go up to a guy in a bar and call him a bunch of names, you are committing a crime (disturbing the peace). See Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire.

I'm torn. I'm very fond of the First Amendment. But it does bother me that this film seems to have been made for the express purpose of insulting Islam. One may have a legal right to make such a thing, but I'm not sure one has a moral right to make it.

Which is why I would be very comfortable with the guy going back to jail for breaking his parole, which I'm pretty sure he has.

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 9:19 AM  

This post on Neil Gaiman's blog adds a whole new twist to this...


By Blogger Liz Holliday, at 2:28 AM  

Yeah, this Bassily guy committed fraud. He's probably covered himself with releases, and I'm not a lawyer, but morally he deserves to go away for a long time.

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 2:03 PM  

Seems to me like the whole film was cooked up to engineer a "let's you and him fight!" situation.


By Blogger Dwight Williams, at 10:21 PM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.