CHRIS ABBOTT, PART TWOComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog




Archives

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022

August 2022

September 2022

November 2022

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

July 2023

September 2023

November 2023

January 2024

February 2024

 

Wednesday, May 04, 2005

Here's the second part of my interview with showrunner and creator Chris Abbott, author of the new book Ten Minutes to the Pitch.


AE: Could you talk a little about tracking what the audience expects, and how you write to take advantage of that? Do you like to leave hints for people about what's going to happen (who did it, etc.) , or do you prefer to surprise them, or does it depend on the show?

CA: I love to — my favorite writers always know what the audience expects and completely turn a corner on them. But you have to do it in a way that isn't cheating. Everything you see has to be true but it can also be looked at in another way. Look at The Usual Suspects, Sixth Sense.

AE: The same facts, but with different meanings.

CA: Thing is it has to be emotionally compelling before the twist and then after the twist as well. It has to work at both levels.

I like to surprise people and I think it's really important to do every step of the way no matter what. Raymond — I never expect what they're about to say, and yet you say "I knew he was going to say that." The element of surprise has to be happening. I'd rather surprise an audience than be logical. You can't be so illogical you throw the audience out, but if you can find the thinnest tiniest strand of logic — too much logic is the murderer of good scripts. Scripts are like dreams. you kinda go into a dream state. You don't care about logic so long as you're not pulled out of the scene. Like that Al Pacino movie about Alaska, where he couldn't sleep, because the sun is up all the time — Insomnia — right away from the beginning of the film, you know, because I've been up in that area of the world and they have blackout drapes everywhere. It's dark. So the whole movie falls apart.

There are certain logical steps you have to take. Then you can open it up. If you ground it in reality in the beginning then you can take liberties later on.

AE: And you can have a plothole only so long as the result is more entertaining than it would be if you didn't have the plothole.

CA: And you can't have a plothole just because it's convenient to the writer. That irritates them.

AE: Let's talk about tracking the audience's expectations.

CA: I like to leave hints so some people can figure it out. Especially when I'm writing mysteries. Then I leave big red herrings everywhere.

AE: Like when you create a character who's super likable, so you know right away they're going to get killed.

CA: Or teenagers having sex — those are horror films. I try to mix it up as much as I can.

AE: What are you doing in Utah?

CA: You can't be in Utah early in a career and if you're going to run a show you have to be in LA. Though actually I could have lived anywhere. On Magnum PI I spent five years shooting in Hawaii. Then I was on a show in Florida with Burt Reynolds, then a show in North Carolina, then a show in Virginia. If you have enough of a reputation you can live anywhere. I moved up here because I hadn't been writing for episodic television so much. But as it turns out in the endless world of reinvention I live in, I got a call from daytime TV, so now I'm writing that. Everybody lives out of town and we do story conferences by telephone. We have Yahoo messenger so we can write things to each other while we talk, but you need to be on the phone so you can hear people's voices.

AE: What about, like, CU-SeeMe? Internet teleconferencing?

CA: Maybe someday. But being out of town works great. I can write features and I'm working on a novel and because I've lived in LA for 25 years my agent doesn't care where I am. He's very happy if I send him something.

AE: I've been told that the second act out is supposed to be a curveball that changes the story significantly, and the third act out leaves the protagonist in maximum jeopardy (whether physical, emotional or moral). What does the first act out do?

CA: When we were doing Magnum, the way Don Bellisario explained it, the act two out was where the hero was in maximum physical jeopardy, and the act three out reaches to the heart of where the hero now sees what he's been blind to — he's been wrong, he has to change everything and fix it.

There aren't really action adventure shows any more, so for the act two out, I like what you're saying. Misdirection is always good.

For the act one out, it used to be it set up what the show was going to be about, but with today's faster story telling, the first scene does that.

Act one out would be what keeps the protagonist hooked or involved. What means they can't get out.

AE: Sort of, act one out is "Nope, the easy fix ain't gonna work."

CA: One thing I should add, something that we never paid much attention to but they're doing now... at the beginning of every act there's a slight recap for people who're just now tuning in, or who don't stay focused. It doesn't have to be much, just a few lines to pull them through.

Labels:

1 Comments:

Wow. Awesome detail. Great resource. Thanks.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:31 AM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.



This page is powered by Blogger.