MY FAVORITE FILMSComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022

August 2022

September 2022

November 2022

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

July 2023

September 2023

November 2023

January 2024

February 2024

June 2024


Thursday, May 19, 2005

Since you ask, Larry:

All That Jazz
Annie Hall
Some Like It Hot
Bladerunner, theatrical cut
Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, theatrical cut
Moulin Rouge!
Groundhog Day
Sleepless In Seattle
When Harry Met Sally

My point about structure, though, John, wasn't that you can't find three acts. My point was how does it help you to call the first two sequences the first act? Does that mean you're doing all your setup only in the first act? That all your characters are introduced by the end of the first act? That the plot's on train tracks by the end of the first act? I can find three acts in Hard Day's Night too, if I decide I want to find them, but then I'm just shoehorning a few sequences into each act. Three Act Structure doesn't inform that movie. Nor does it Forrest Gump. It seems more meaningful to talk in terms of sequences for some movies, because the story does naturally break down into sequences. I don't think Bob Fosse was too worried about Three Act Structure when he wrote/edited/magicked up All That Jazz. Do you?


ALL THE JAZZ and the other two you mentioned are not "classic stories." Although, if you talk to Zemeckis he might debate it.

Annie Hall, Some Like it Hot, Casablanca, Bladerunner, Groundhog Day, and those Ephron films are all absolutely traditional 3-act stories.

Read Vogler or Campbell, or check out John Truby or Stephen Cannell or other guys that talk about stucture on their web sites.

It sounds to me like you're equating the classic 3-act with some kind of "rules" that someone said you had to impose if using it. Just because a character is introduced 50 pages into a script doesn't mean the structure isn't 3-act. And perhaps the plot doesn't have to be "on train tracks" by the end of act one, but if you don't know what the story is 12-25 pages into a script, you've got a bad script.

IMHO, when you start talking sequences in films instead of story/structure, you are getting into why there are so few good movies made today as opposed to 25+ years ago. A good sequence or set of sequences has trumped a good story because of the presumed ADD of the ticket buying audience.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:19 AM  

The other main reason for talking three-act structure is the fact that 90% of the time, the person looking to break it isn't doing it from a tortured-genius-constricted-by-the-form point of view.

I taught a very introductory "baby" structure intro screenwriting course at a Canadian university and inevitably the guy (and for whatever reason, it was always a guy) who wanted to NOT talk about three act was someone who ... well .... let's just say I haven't seen any of THEIR movies on anyone's all time best lists.

I used to say, "you understand that when ee cummings broke all rules of punctuation, it's not because he didn't know what those rules were but eventually I stopped saying that because it took too long to explain ee cummings.

Okay. I'm depressed now. Bring me a Michael Bay film.

By Blogger DMc, at 4:26 PM  

This is great stuff. I love reading this stuff.

At the end of the day, if the script is a satisfying page turner, that's a good goal to have no?

Keep on talking guys, this is great stuff!

And Incredibles is still yet to be fathomed, it is so great. Some of the camera moves in that film, are beyond what was once imagined, and the sheer excuberance of the visual story telling reminds me of the kinitic City of God, but I don't want to confine it to just that one reference.. and a thousand saturday childhood mornings watching TV on the seventies carpet.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7:30 PM  

I'm going to try to answer the question of why the three-act structure is helpful, but I think, Alex, that by asking about the first act you're missing the point.

The key to understanding the three-act structure usefully is the second act. The establishment of the main tension that drives the movie. The first act is everything that leads up to the establishment of that tension, and the third act is everything that follows it's resolution.

Now, what I like about looking at sequences (of seven acts, or eight, or however many you find in a given film) is that it emphasizes the turning-point nature of good screenwriting. Tensions are constantly being created and resolved, and that's good - and if looking at it in terms of sequences helps people do that, great.

But the weakess of that approach is, IMO, that it tends to result in scattered storytelling. A strong story is MORE than just a series of twists - it is a series of CONNECTED events. I think that when you neglect a three-act approach you tend to come up with a film like "Gangs of New York" - a film which has many virtues, but, narratively, it's a mess.

Scorsese has written that he's not a fan of the three-act structure (or rather, he talks about it in a book of interviews I have with him) and I think, unfortunately, that's not surprising given the major weakness of his movie; they tend to be sprawling, messy, and unfocused.

The idea of the first act is that you have to establish the status quo, introduce the problem of the story, and push the protaganist to a moment of irreversible decision. That's a lot to do in 25 pages.

But thinking in terms of those specific problems can help you get your story moving forward quickly, and yes, definitely has value.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:56 AM  

Please let me just say THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU for your recommendation for All That Jazz. It was one of those movies I had ignored just because it looked... well... corny, I guess. But wow. Amazing. So thank you for the recommendation. And to any of you out there confused as to why this is on Alex's list, GO WATCH IT!!!

Sorry, I'm a little excitable. Just wanted to say thanks.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:33 AM  

It seems as though the only person who can truely determine the "acts" of a movie is the one who wrote it. Otherwise we're just trying to use certain sequences to estimate where one act begins and another ends.

By Blogger Jason Sanders, at 4:10 AM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.