VEHICLESComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022

August 2022

September 2022

November 2022

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

July 2023

September 2023

November 2023

January 2024

February 2024


Monday, May 30, 2005

Here's an odd question to ask in the abstract. Would you ever pitch a star vehicle without having a star handy?

Lisa and I are working up a comedy pitch, and the concept allows us to go ensemble cast or lead-and-supporting. I like it as a lead-and-supporting, but we're writing without talent attached, and one problem with lead-and-supporting is if your lead isn't marvelous, the show's dead, no matter how good the writing is. On the other hand if you're hanging it on a lead, then you can spend a little extra money on your lead; and a busy, successful actor is more likely to say yes to a lead role than one-of-the-gang. On the other other hand, with a lead, inside one year you've probably got a diva, and that's a headache in itself.

I'm not sure there is an answer to this one, but that's what I'm pondering this morning. (Are you pondering what I'm pondering?)


"Would you ever pitch a star vehicle without having a star handy?" To give an answer in the perfectly abstract: no, I wouldn't.

Are you saying that an ensemble-show stands a good chance of being successful if the writing is good, whereas a show with a 'lead and supporting' will die if the lead isn't marvelous - even when the writing is excellent? Or am I misunderstanding you?

I think you should definitely go for what pitches best and/or what you like best.


By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:08 AM  

I have pondered what you're pondering, Alex, and it's a tricky situation. I'm developing a TV series that is intended to be a star vehicle for a particular well-known Canadian actress and a male Hollywood B-list celeb. Both are friends of mine and both want in on this project, whatever it takes, just do my best to make it happen. So, what do you do when you you've got celebrity talent practically signing on the dotted line before the pilot script is even finished? Do you pitch it to prodcos and mention their names? If you do and they don't like the people you had in mind, they may decide to pass on the project. But if you don't mention that your casting choices are eager to sign up, they may decide to go a whole different route and then you're helming a series staring people you don't know or don't like, leaving your friends, who've devoted themselves to the project for months (the Canadian actress) and years (the L.A.-based actor), out in the cold.

You're damned if you do...and damned if you don't.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:49 PM  

Kelly -

I'm a feature guy and have only done a few television pitches, none of which were picked up, so pardon me if I'm off base, but your problem seems like a no-brainer. If you're developing the pitch specifically for talent that has already said yes, include the talent in the pitch. The talent is one of your major assets. In addition, it sounds like the talent helped you develop the pitch. They didn't do that for no reason. You owe them something. Looking at the downside... what was the downside, again? That the production companies might pass even though they like your pitch because they don't like the talent that you specifically developed it for? If it's really developed for this particular talent, how much sense does it make without them? What is the real chance of this downside materializing? Doesn't sound like much of a downside.

If you really developed the pitch specifically for this talent - trust yourself. Pitch it the way you intend it to be made. Live or die by your creative instincts, not by the hope that fudging a pitch might catch the interest of a producer who otherwise doesn't get it.

As I said above, this is a little outside my area, but I really don't see the "damned if you don't" part.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:22 AM  

I think you pitch it with the talent on board but not attached. As in "so and so wants to do it." Then if the studio doesn't like so and so, they'll tell you. If you've developed it with that person, of course, you owe them some kind of buyout if the show goes forward without them. That's what some of the funky producer credits are for.

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 9:33 AM  

Jon and Alex...

My series was developed with these these two particular actors in mind, and it was only after all the really hard work was done (9 years of research, planning and writing) that I contacted them to tell them about my series. They both loved the project and vowed to stick with me as I launched my prodco pitching blitz (doing that this spring and summer). The actress, who is married to the president of a Canadian network, has offered her assistance in getting the project to her husband (must find a prodco first, was turned down by 3 just this morning) but warns that I should, as Alex suggested, pitch it without getting specific about names right up front, and then say, "Well so-and-so wants to do it." only after negotiations are underway.

God, I hate all this strategizing and conniving. It's not good for my health. :(

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:01 PM  

Ohhhh... in that case I would go to Muse, say, and tell'em, "I've got an in with so-and-so, but I can't say I do until I have you attached."

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 2:27 PM  

You mean, be honest!!? Wow, what a strategy! Thanks for the tip, Alex. :-)

KJC (who has just located the Muse website and will email Jesse Prupas today)

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:49 PM  

Alex, Jesse from Muse just contacted me and he wants to see my proposal. I fucking LOVE you, man! Thanks, again, for the tip and, BTW, you do know you're on my list of writers for the show, right? :-)

KJC (who also just found out that a letter she wrote has been published in the summer edition of Canadian Screenwriter magazine, RE: the SF edition featuring an interview with Alex)

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7:48 PM  

Mazel tov, Kelly, and good luck with Jesse. He's a good guy, and plays a mean hand at poker. Let me know how it goes with him.

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 10:36 PM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.