[POLITICS] In other news, Bush doesn't veto laws. He just adds a presidential "signing statement" saying he doesn't have to abide by them.
Obviously, y'all Democrats are horrified. But you Republicans: I mean, doesn't this bother you? A President simply deciding that he doesn't have to obey the law? Uh, when you let the man in charge get away with breaking the law, isn't that called "dictatorship"?
No comments:
Post a Comment