Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Game, TV, and Screenwriting Blog


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021


Thursday, October 12, 2006

Watched 30 Rock last night as well. Some of it was funny. Some of it was dumb. Some of it was dumb-funny, which is just fine.

As with Studio 60, few of the laughs were in the show-within-the-show comedy skits. (Though I did like "Science, Schmience" in S60's 3rd ep.)

And that's a danger in putting art within your art. A comedy sketch within your comedy (or drama) suffers from the "make me laugh" syndrome: you're telling the audience something is funny, which is a practically guaranteed way to make sure it's not funny. Jokes come from derailment, and if you have a comedy sketch within your comedy, you've already derailed the train before it can get up to steam.

There's a similar danger any time you want to show that someone is a great actor, or a great artist, or a great dancer. If you've got someone performing "To be or not to be" in your TV episode and you're telling us this guy can really act -- well, it better be one of the most impressing freakin' "To be or not to be"'s we've ever seen. Otherwise you provoke a reaction: That's brilliant acting? (I didn't find Jack Crew's "To be or not to be" in Slings and Arrows to be all that compelling. Did you?)

Whereas if you tell us your character is the best race car driver in the world, we'll just buy it. We have no way to evaluate one race car driver vs. another. Well, except that winners win. And we all know what winning a car race looks like. We just accept that the hero wins because he's good, not because he has a better car.

If it's something the audience can't evaluate, we may just buy it. I've got a couple of characters in my current feature that are supposed to be good artists. We'll try to get good artists to do their charcoal sketches for them, but everyone's got their own idea of what a good piece of art looks like. I don't think too many people in the audience will reject the art, so long as the technique is good.

Sometimes you have to fake it intentionally. Real ballet, to my mind, doesn't look that interesting on film, at least not to the mass audience. It seems to me that much of the time you have a ballet scene that scores, the filmmakers have jazzed it up. I doubt Jennifer Beals's dance moves would have got her into ballet school in Flashdance and I doubt John Travolta's moves in Stayin' Alive would impress Balanchine either. But they worked on film. (And while I'm horrifying the purists: I prefer Tex-Mex to authentic Mexican, and I prefer Upper West Side Szechuan to authentic Chinatown Szechuan. Because I'm an Upper West Sider, not an authentic Chinese person.)

Be careful when you put art within your art. If it's something the audience knows well, it better score. In Broadcast News, James Brooks had real news editors edit the news segments, rather than his usual feature editor. He wanted to be sure the broadcast news segments smelled right to an audience that knows exactly what a broadcast news segment is. If you can't make the art within the art score, find a way to give us clues how we're supposed to interpret it, or better yet, find ways that you don't have to put it up on the scre



Hate to put you on the spot like this, Mr. Upper West Sider, but now that you bring up food.... Whose bagels do you prefer, those of your native city or those of your adopted city?

By Blogger Webs, at 1:00 PM  

St. Viateur all the way!

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 1:55 PM  

I watched it last night too. I still find it so strange that after a drought of so many years, we now have TWO shows about television. Like they say at that restaurant I can't really remember the name of right now, I'm lovin' it!

I thought 30 Rock started weak - to the point where I got that "I'm embarrassed by that scene and/or joke" feeling - and ended strong.

In particular, for a show by a comedy writer as revered as Tina Fey, I thought the opening scene with the hot dogs was lame. I didn't find it funny that she was that passionate about the situation, and the follow up conversation with her producer sounded like canned character development. (She said something like "You know how I don't like it when people cheat or lie?") It was bad. What did you think of it?

However, there were some super funny moments. Thank God for PVR; A couple of times I rewound the part where she first meets Tracey. I loved the bit where they were sitting at the table, Tracey gets insulted when the waiter offers him Pumpkin Steak (or something similar), so he leaves for a place more to his taste. As he enters the new diner he asks the woman to get him an Apple Chicken and some other fruity type meal. I honestly thought that was the show's best joke, and it was basically a throw away.

And of course, Alec Baldwin is great no matter where you put him. "Five inches. But it's thick."

Sorry for rambling!
The Rambler

By Blogger Trellick Tower, at 2:01 PM  


Just started reading your blog today and love it. One question - any chance I can convince you to not make the post titles in all caps?

I syndicate your blog into my Netvibes, and seeing a big thick stacks of capital letters hurts my soul. I'm sure I'm not the only one who think so.

By Blogger IA, at 5:20 PM  

Actually, I think the joke you refer to is that he was offered pumpkin ravioli and he takes her to a place where there's real food and they have beer and fried chicken.

I still didn't find it that funny. Alec Baldwin was hilarious. But the rest just get me laughing that much. The hot dog thing was horrible ... what a weak way to limp into a series.

Maybe I am prejudiced by my pity for Rachel Dratch. She's funny, and totally wasted. It seems she's the designated idiot stick holder for each episode, which is a hard pill to swallow when you were originally the star.

By Blogger ME, at 11:30 PM  

Ah yes, it was pumpkin ravioli. I couldn't remember the dish. Yes it's true he went somewhere with real food and he knew everyone, but I really think that joke was intentional, ie. No to pumpkin ravioli, but Yes to apple chicken.

Glad to see some there is some agreement on the hot dog scene.

By Blogger Trellick Tower, at 11:43 PM  

I thought 30 Rock was really good. I was in a bad mood when I started watching and in a better mood when I finished. Then this morning on the drive to work I chuckled remembering some of the jokes. So all in all, a good sign.

Plus, on 30 Rock nobody is saying that The Girlie Show is brilliant or the network's flagship show or anything. Maybe it's terrible and that's why they're bringing in Martin Lawe--er, Tracy Jordan.

Now Studio 60 on the other hand...

Well, I've been liking it, and forgiving it for having the "funny show" not be that funny, but the last episode really p'd me off. They may as well have said it was all a dream.

And does anyone really care about the President of NBS' ex-husband?

Or about the head writer or producer of the show? I knew the head writer of SNL was Tina Fey becaus she was on camera, I wouldn't know her if she was only a writer, and I'm a fan of TV and of SNL in particular. Lorne Michaels also performs on camera sometimes, so he's easy to know.

I guess Studio 60 is just conceited in general. I'll probably drop it if it doesn't improve a little soon.

By Blogger Dante Kleinberg, at 2:14 PM  

I thought it was pretty lame. Tracey Morgan pretty much can only play Tracey Morgan. I like Tina Fey, but I don't know about this show.

By Blogger Lawrence, at 1:30 AM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.