Epagogix, or, the BorgComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Game, TV, and Screenwriting Blog


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021


Saturday, October 14, 2006

Malcolm Gladwell has an interesting article (does he have any other kind?) in this week's New Yorker about Epagogix, a company that uses a neural network AI to predict box office receipts with better-than-studio-executive accuracy. They analyze what -- the star package? The director? The release date? Competition? No, they analyze only the script elements.

Naturally the analysis is most accurate when you're looking at major studio releases that get enough publicity. With indie pictures it's not so accurate because those films need to catch the breaks.

It's surprising, because much as I think screenwriters are undervalued in showbiz, a bad director can screw up a film pretty badly, as can miscasting. And while a bad director will usually insist on screwing up the script before he shoots, he doesn't always. Toys would be a good example -- a very funny script misdirected as a poignant drama by Barry Levinson.

If Epagogix is as good as Gladwell says, it doesn't mean studios will stop chasing star right away, because that is what they know how to do. It will take one studio adopting a script-based system for greenlighting projects, and creaming the competition by hiring cheaper stars and writing better scripts, before it catches on. Sort of like what happened with the Arizona Diamondbacks Oakland A's, an underfunded baseball team whose managers adopted a new metric for evaluating what players they wanted to hire, and kicked butt. [Correction thanks to Webs].

Studio execs can use their service to decide which direction the script needs to go. As Gladwell points out, the analysis doesn't fix your problem for you -- you still need a screenwriter to fix it -- but it can show where you're at, and what might work fixing it. It's like a similar service that analyzes your song and tells you whether it is in hit territory or not. No computer can generate a hit. But a computer can now tell you if something is not a hit, and give you hints about what aspects of the song are keeping it out of hit territory. It can tell you your bass line isn't working; it can't tell you how to fix it.

What the article doesn't really address, though, is that Epagogix's service only works as well as the people who are coding the script into the computer. In this case, it's two guys from Britain who have watched thousands and thousands of films and thought about them. And their judgments are subjective. So you don't really have a stand-alone computer program. You have intelligent readers enhanced by a neural network. Neither can function without the other. The computer can't do its thing without the readers' subjective judgment. The readers can't duplicate the delicate weighting of dozens of factors that the neural network can do in a blink.

It will be interesting to see how much of our job AI's start to take over. Will we be assimilated?


I'm guessing resistance is futile.

By Blogger Kelly J. Crawford, at 1:36 PM  

Not the Diamondbacks. The Diamondbacks won the World Series in 2001 on the backs of high-priced talent like Curt Schilling, Randy Johnson, and Matt Williams.

You're probably thinking of the low-budget Oakland A's, who have bought into alternate theories of player evaluation, as covered in "Moneyball". The current A's have had phenomenal success in terms of wins and making the playoffs, but haven't made it into the World Series yet.

Here are the latest World Series winners with their rank in payroll:

2005 Chicago 13th
2004 Boston 2nd
2003 Florida 25th
2002 Anaheim 15th
2001 Arizona 8th
2000 New York 1st
1999 New York 1st
1998 New York 1st

The only one that stands out is Florida, but that franchise has adopted any novel approach. That was dumb luck and good, durable pitching.

By Blogger Webs, at 5:21 PM  

It will take one studio adopting a script-based system for greenlighting projects, and creaming the competition by hiring cheaper stars and writing better scripts, before it catches on...team whose managers adopted a new metric for evaluating...

This is similar to what I have experienced in the DVD Premiere realm:

Concept is first.
Artwork that sells the concept is second.
Feedback from retailers is third. The script is fourth.
Star power is fifth.


Primarily because the first three steps are steps that can be controlled and tested before the script and pre-production phases. The last two steps depend on the first three. In the low budget DVD world - no one makes a movie they don't think they can make their money back on relatively quickly. The stars are there to deliver name value and credibility.

In terms of writing, its the "pulp screenwriter's" job to write a script that lives up to the concept, the artwork and the retailers expectations as well as staying within the strict budget parameters.

DVD Premieres in this baseball analogy are "base hits" - individually not spectacular, but taken as a team effort, produce great financial results.

Studios need to quit this "all or nothing" blockbuster mentality that not only limits the number of movies made, but strains the financial underpinnings of a company. Thankfully they are starting to realize this as more and more films are being made in the "$25M or under" category. (Example: Michael Bay's deal with Rogue Pictures). We need more movies with smaller, fiscally-responsible budgets.

By Blogger Cunningham, at 6:24 PM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.