Spec Ep QueriesComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog


April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022

August 2022

September 2022

November 2022

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

July 2023

September 2023

November 2023

January 2024

February 2024


Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Q. Will you read my spec COLD CASE episode query? Here it is.
I don't evaluate other people's work for free unless I know and love them. But you don't really need me to check out your spec episode query anyway. A feature query has to impart a lot of things in a nutshell, including who the protagonist is and what the venue is. With a spec episode, the show you're speccing gives you that. We know who the characters are and what they do for a living. All you have to do is tell us a few words about what makes your CSI, HOUSE or DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES special -- what's the heart of the episode -- what's the main character's fresh and interesting problem. E.g., "House discovers his dying patient is genetically his sister."

As a side note, I'm not sure you should be speccing COLD CASE. You should be speccing a contemporary hit show. Your spec is useless unless the person you're sending it to is familiar with the show. Personally, I've never seen COLD CASE; I've only seen one episode of the Canuck show it was apparently ripped off from inspired by, COLD SQUAD. I might be able to tell if you're a bad writer, but any special brilliance you demonstrate in nailing COLD CASE would be lost on me.

UPDATE: J.M. comments:
"Cold Case" is rated #10 in this week's U.S. Nielsen's. If that's not a contemporary hit...
True. But numbers don't tell the whole story. You need a show that's a hit with showrunners and network execs. That's often a show that people talk about. Usually it's a show with great writing. I haven't seen much media at all about COLD CASE, which is why I brushed it off. I suspect few or no showrunners are watching the show; while probably all showrunners checked out STUDIO 60 even with its lousy numbers. (Not that S60 is a good spec either.) Entourage is a good spec because everyone in Hollywood watches it, or has at least checked it out.

You need a successful show, yes. But you need to spec a show that appeals to the people who will recommend or hire you, because if they don't know it, they won't read your spec of it.

How do you figure out which shows people want to read? Ask an agent's assistant. Just call up a few lit agents at big agencies -- CAA, ICM, Endeavor -- and ask their assistants what they're recommending their clients spec. I suspect COLD CASE is not on the list. But don't trust me. Verify.

Labels: ,


"Cold Case" is rated #10 in this week's U.S. Nielsen's. If that's not a contemporary hit...

By Blogger Unknown, at 7:53 PM  

Hmmmn. I get what you're saying, but I wonder if Cold Case would be the best example of it? Because Cold Case is a "case" show, a very procedural-y procedural. (Not that I've seen it so much myself.) So to write it you would need to hit the plot and emotional notes of *your* own case of the week, but once you've done that, you've already nailed the show. Other than the super-consistent formula that you could probably find ways to tip the reader off to (here comes the montage, set to disco!), it doesn't appear to rely too much on the episodes that came before, or have a main character that it would be super-easy to get wrong.

I'm not writing a Cold Case spec, I'm just wondering. Is that better, or worse?

By Blogger nadia*, at 1:56 AM  

Trust the man. If he says don't spec Cold Case, he's bound to be right. How do I know? Because for months, Alex has been praising Friday Night Lights again and again. He's been like a free PR person for this show. And despite the fact that I trust him enough to check in daily at this blog and also buy 2 books from him, I doubted his love of FNL. And then because the only thing on was America's Next Top Model (enough said) and some unfunny ABC comedies, I turned on FNL. I found a show that captured small town Texas life so well, I almost felt sick (and I can say that since I spent those same years in another small Texas town.) It's so pitch perfect, I just can't believe I've missed it. They got everything right, the relationships, the football, the drama and the most realistic attack on a woman I've seen on television. This is what appointment TV. The only thing that makes me angry is that I've missed half the season. Can't wait until the DVD. Sorry for not believing Alex. It won't happen again!

By Blogger Hollie Nell, at 2:36 AM  

The big procedural spec to write right now is Criminal Minds. Why that is, I have no idea. People do read Cold Case specs, or used to at least. Probably not so much any more.

Best not to write specs period at this point in time, unless you're entering ABC/Disney or Warner Bros. People want to read original material.

By Blogger Shawn, at 10:40 AM  

Ok, FNL is my favorite show of the season, but would you recommend doing a spec for it? I'd think not.

By Blogger JC, at 6:28 AM  

I would wait and see if FNL gets picked up for a second season. I hear that's touch and go.

Also, not everyone has seen it; and not everyone who sees it gets it. The people who get it love it passionately. But people I respect (e.g. DMc) don't dig it.

Also, hard to spec a show that depends heavily on improvised dialog.

Anyway, DON'T ASK ME. Ask an agent's assistant. They've got their finger on the pulse. I don't. I am not trying to get a staff job, and I am not speccing scripts. ASK AN ASSISTANT OR TWO.

By Blogger Alex Epstein, at 8:49 AM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.

This page is powered by Blogger.